7 YEAR PEACE TREATY SIGNING: September 2006

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

NEW MIDEAST SUMMIT IN SPAIN

SPAIN #11 IN THE EU

DANIEL 7:23-24
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast(THE EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TR BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise:(10 NATIONS) and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.(BE HEAD OF 3 KINGS OR NATIONS).

September 27, 2006Spain floats idea of new Madrid peace summit (Reuters)

CAIRO (Reuters) - Spain has floated the idea of a secondMiddle East peace summit along the lines of the Madridconference which opened the way to direct peace talks between Israel and its neighbors in 1991. Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos, who servedas the European UnionEuropean Union’s Middle East envoy until 2003, said inan article published on Wednesday that the quartet of Middle East mediators might also be expanded to include new countries.

Perhaps it would be timely for all the interested partiesto meet again, at the same level as in 1991, to reaffirm theircommitment to a comprehensive solution and to the basicprinciples on which that should be based,he said in thearticle in the Arabic-language newspaper al-Hayat.The Madrid peace conference of 1991 brought together former U.S. President George Bush, Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev,Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir and foreign ministersfrom Jordan, Syria,Lebanon and Egypt.

The conference was based on the principle that Israelshould give up occupied land in return for peace with its Arabneighbors, as had already happened between Israel and Egypt.It led to a peace treaty between Israel and Jordan in 1994and a series of high-level talks between Israel and Syria,which came close to an agreement in 2000.Moratinos said the war between Israel and the Lebaneseguerrilla group Hizbollah this summer showed the futility ofseeking military solutions to the Arab-Israeli conflict or oftrying to impose solutions unilaterally.

At this stage the important thing is not to invent newsolutions but to have the courage, the historic generosity andthe political will to apply the formulas … which have alreadybeen examined to a very large extent in the course of previousnegotiations, such as Camp David and Taba, he added.At Camp David in 2000 and at the Red Sea resort of Taba inearly 2001, Israeli and Palestinian negotiators came close toagreement on the borders of a Palestinian state.

Subsequent Israeli governments stepped back from theproposals then on offer and have preferred to try unilateralsolutions, such as building a barrier through the West Bank and with drawing from the Gaza Strip without a formal agreement.On the Quartet, which comprises the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations, Moratinos said:(It) could incorporate the added value of some countries whichare key to the region.The European Union and the Arab League, seeing anopportunity after the Lebanon war, have floated several proposals for reviving Middle East peace negotiations.The Arab countries tried this month to
persuade the U.N.Security Council to initiate a process but the United States,Israel’s ally, prevented the council from making a statement.
Source: us.rd.yahoo.com

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

ALLUSIONS IN MIDEAST PEACE

Allusions to Progress in Mid-East Peace Process

AG - Patrick Seale - Is the ice cracking in the long-frozen Middle East peace process? Is a thaw on the way? At a meeting with Palestinian Authority President Mahmud Abbas at the UN last week, U.S. President George W. Bush reaffirmed his 'vision' of an independent Palestinian state living side-by-side with Israel.www.agenceglobal.com. There appear to be plenty of activity on the international level at renewed efforts for a Palestinian-Israeli agreement. But there is nothing substantial afoot, and no coordinated effort to address the essential issues. Moreover, neither Israel nor the PA shows any sign of movement.

The Mirage of a Middle East SettlementPatrick Seale,Agence Global,September 25, 2006
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will soon be heading for the Middle East, presumably to explore how to get things moving.The Bush administration seems to be awakening from its six-year torpor regarding the Arab-Israeli peace process. It may even have begun to recognise the limits of military power and to be considering the possible merits of dialogue, not only between Israelis and Palestinians but even between the United States itself and Iran.But that is as far as it goes: talks about talks. There is still no hint that America is prepared to use real muscle to bring about a settlement.In European and Arab capitals, hopes are still alive -- if only just -- that Fatah and Hamas may eventually bury the hatchet and form a national unity government, which will agree to renounce violence, accept past agreements and -- if not explicitly, then at least implicitly -- recognise Israel, thus meeting the main demands of the international community.

A flurry of other signals seems to suggest that something is afoot. Britain's Prime Minister Tony Blair, under attack at home and abroad for joining America's war on Iraq and condoning Israel's war on Lebanon, has again declared that his priority is to secure an Israeli-Palestinian settlement. However, as he has done little to advance this goal in nearly ten years of office, his latest statement has about as much value as a deathbed confession.Another small sign of movement is the invitation from the Quartet (the United Nations, United States, Russian Federation and European Union) invitation to former World Bank president James Wolfensohn to return to the Palestinian territories to oversee the disbursement of international aid which, it is suggested, might soon be renewed. Wolfensohn, it will be recalled, resigned from the job earlier in the year in protest at the suspension of aid following the Hamas victory at last January's elections.

Alarmed by the real possibility of a humanitarian disaster in Gaza, the European Union has now agreed to provide emergency funds for a further three months, while Israel has come under some pressure, including from the U.S., to release $500 million of Palestinian tax money it has impounded.Meanwhile, prominent voices continue to call for a return to the negotiating table. A recent appeal has come from Gareth Evans, president of the influential International Crisis Group. Writing in The Financial Times of London on 20 September, Evans with considerable courage called on Israel and the Quartet to accept the leadership chosen by the Palestinians as a legitimate partner. Hamas, he wrote, has earned the democratic right to a place in government.
Going to the heart of the matter, he urged Israel to exercise reciprocity -- to honour agreements such as the road map, to transfer tax revenues, to end assassinations, incursions and bombardment, and to resume bilateral negotiations in good faith.This is where all current attempts to revive the peace process break down. The Israeli government led by Ehud Olmert is not ready to enter into serious talks with the Palestinians. Indeed, it will do everything to avoid them, including mobilising its powerful friends in the United States against any such initiative.To escape pressure from the international community, Olmert might agree to meet Mahmud Abbas, but that is as far as he is likely to go.As a result of the fiasco in Lebanon, the Olmert government may not survive. But even if it does, it is politically too weak to contemplate a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians which, in any event, runs counter to its ideology and to the wishes of most of its members.

Rather than contemplating a return to anything like the 1967 borders -- a central demand of the so-called Palestinian Prisoners' document and of the Arab peace initiative of March 2002 -- Israel continues its relentless expansion into Palestinian territory.To cite a single example among many, earlier this month Olmert authorized construction bids for another 690 homes in the Maaleh Adumim and Betar Illit settlements, which threaten to cut off Arab East Jerusalem from the West Bank. The United States made a pro forma objection to which Israel paid not the slightest notice.The truth is that the Bush administration is far from ready to throw its weight behind an Israeli-Palestinian settlement. Influenced by pro-Israeli neo-cons, it has on the contrary played down the importance or the urgency of such a settlement. Above all, it has never publicly recognised that the hostility -- and the terrorist threat -- it faces in the Arab and Muslim world is largely a result of its Palestine policy.

On the contrary, the neo-con argument is that Arab anger at the United States has nothing to do with America's support for Israel but is a product of backward Arab societies, of their violent culture and fanatical religion. To be safe -- so the neo-con argument goes -- the United States must reform Arab societies, if necessary by force. Little wonder that resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict has slipped a long way down the list of America's national priorities.Patrick Seale is a leading British writer on the Middle East, and the author of The Struggle for Syria; also, Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East; and Abu Nidal: A Gun for Hire.
Copyright © 2006 Patrick Seale

Saturday, September 23, 2006

HAMAS WON'T RECOGNIZE ISRAEL

Thursday, September 21, 2006

MIDEAST SPOT LIGHT AT UN

HAPPY ROSH HASHANA ISRAEL ON SEPTEMBER 22,2006 (TOMORROW)

WHORE (WORLD CHURCH) AND BEAST (EU)( DICTATOR)
IN MIDEAST PEACE PROCESS

Well heres the headline I have been waiting for, since the World Church will be commiting fornication with the Kings of the Earth,the church has to be involved in the Peace Process, especially the Vatican. And since the EU DICTATOR and the false World Church Pope in the future will work hand in glove, real close, the Inter-Religious community has to be involved in the peace process.

And also if the Religious community would not be involved, the 3RD TEMPLE would not get rebuilt because the Secularists and leftists could care less if the 3RD TEMPLE BE REBUILT. Its the Religious Jews that will want the 3RD TEMPLE REBUILT.

REVELATION 17:1-13
1 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.(VATICAN)
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.

Jewish ambassador urges religious role in Mideast peace
By JANICE ARNOLD Staff Reporter

MONTREAL - The Orthodox rabbi who is mandated to act as world Jewry’s ambassador to other religions told an international conference here that political leaders in the Middle East have made a fatal and tragic error in not recognizing the religious dimension to the conflict.

There is a tendency to see religion as part of the problem and, therefore, to have nothing to do with it… They say you religious people keep away, you only make problems and mess things up, said Rabbi David Rosen, president of the Jerusalem-based International Jewish Committee on Interreligious Consultations, the umbrella organization that represents Jews in their relations with other religions.

But that is a fallacy. It fails to understand how profound religious identity is to the people involved. It can’t be ignored. If we don’t want religion to be the problem, we have to make it part and parcel of the solution. Rabbi Rosen was speaking a plenary session of
World’s Religions After September 11: A Global Congress, a five-day conference that drew 2,000 participants from 35 countries, representing more than 20 faiths and practices. He noted that in 1993, when Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and then-Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin shook hands on the White House lawn, there was not one identifiable Palestinian Muslim religious figure or identifiable Israeli Jewish religious figure there. The exclusion of religion from the Oslo process may have led to the dangerous religionization of the renewed conflict that he said has taken place over the past six years. Religion is now being exploited to exacerbate the situation, when it could have been harnessed as a constructive force, Rabbi Rosen suggested.

Today, religious extremists are the ones who are being heard, he said. Political leaders should give moderate religious voices a place in the search for a solution, he said. Our spiritual identity should be seen as a blessing and not a curse. After 9/11, I think there is a glimmer of understanding of that, he said. Rabbi Rosen was an initiator of the Alexandria Summit, held in Egypt four years ago, the first time Muslim, Jewish and Christian leaders came together to approach the Middle East from an interfaith perspective.

It had the endorsement of two enemies Arafat and Ariel Sharon, as well as the blessing of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, whom Rabbi Rosen described as having been hostile to introducing any religious element until then.

The British-born Rabbi Rosen, a former chief rabbi of Ireland, said it’s rare to find an Orthodox rabbi engaged in interreligious activity at any level, and that he is the subject of a great deal of criticism within my own community. Among his many achievements is being a founder of Rabbis for Human Rights. I’m criticized not because I care about Arab human rights, but because I’m working together with Reform rabbis,he said. This is the type of internecine nonsense that we have to move beyond. Sometimes I’m asked why I’m spending so much time with non-Jews. Well, it’s often much easier and nicer… It’s an easier task to be a foreign minister rather than a minister for home affairs.

He does see some progress, however. We managed to involve the whole spectrum of Orthodox rabbis and even ultra-Orthodox rabbis at the international conference of rabbis and imams [held in Seville earlier this year]. Many had never before met a person of a different faith. Rabbi Rosen believes that people of different religions have no choice but to dialogue, and that the three Abrahamic religions, and most Eastern religions, call upon their adherents to be merciful and compassionate. He conceded that this is easier said than done. When people feel wounded, it is more difficult for them to be compassionate. The answer is to treat them with more
compassion, in order that the overcome their woundedness and sense of alienation, he said.

He stressed that everyone in the Middle East sees themselves as a victim. The Palestinians feel vulnerable to Israeli power. Israelis feel vulnerable in a sea of Arab hostility of which the Palestinians are fifth-columnists, and the Arab world feels demeaned and threatened by western culture and the failures of its own leadership. Everyone is waiting for the other side to take the initiative. Rabbi Rosen said the people of the region must overcome the zero-sum mentality that support for one’s own group or partisan position requires insensitivity to others. While it’s true that the Torah gives Jews title to the land of Israel, Rabbi Rosen said, it does
not confer the right to suppress the rights of others. That is against the fundamental principles of the Torah,he said.

A democratic and Jewish state is not a contradiction, he argued. In fact, if it was not democratic it could not be Jewish. The Torah makes clear that every person is made in the divine image and affirms the dignity of each person. Despite the ongoing conflict, Rabbi Rosen noted that interfaith activity is flourishing in Israel. He is a founder of the Interreligious Coordinating Council in Israel, which embraces about 70 organizations involved in interfaith relations. He said there should be more outside support for these activities. Rabbi Rosen is also an international president of the World Conference of Religion for Peace, which incorporates 15 religions in over 50 countries.

Mideast process takes spotlight at U.N. By KIM GAMEL,
Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 20, 10:43 AM ET

UNITED NATIONS - The Mideast peace process was taking the spotlight at the United Nations on Wednesday, with ministers from the Quartet that drafted the stalled road map peace plan the United States, the U.N., the European Union and Russia planning to meet. The Security Council also was scheduled to hold a ministerial meeting Thursday that Arab leaders hope will help revive the peace process.President Bush and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sparred over Tehran's disputed nuclear program but managed to avoid a personal encounter as the 61st General Assembly got under way Tuesday in the shadow of a military coup in
Thailand.U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan stayed on message during an emotional farewell address Tuesday, appealing to the world to unite against human rights abuses, religious divisions, brutal conflicts and an unjust world economy.

Annan, who is to leave office on Dec. 31, also warned that the failure to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will continue to raise questions about the U.N.'s impartiality and stymie its efforts to resolve other conflicts, including those in Iraq and Afghanistan.Jordan's King Abdullah II said that until Israel ends its occupation of Palestinian lands and gives Palestinians their rights, the cycle of violence will continue in the region and its effects will be felt throughout the world.I come before you today with a deep sense of urgency,Abdullah told the assembly.Never has it been more important for the world community to act decisively for peace in my
region.

Bush tried to advance his campaign for democracy in the Middle East during his address to the General Assembly on Tuesday, saying extremists were trying to justify their violence by falsely claiming the U.S. is waging war on Islam. He singled out Iran and Syria as sponsors of terrorism.Bush also pointed to Tehran's rejection of a Security Council demand to stop enriching uranium by Aug. 31 or face the possibility of sanctions. But he addressed his remarks to the Iranian people in a clear insult to the government.The greatest obstacle to this future is that your rulers have chosen to deny you liberty and to use your nation's resources to fund
terrorism and fuel extremism and pursue nuclear weapons, the U.S. leader said.Iran must abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions, he said. Despite what the regime tells you, we have no objection to Iran's pursuit of a truly peaceful nuclear power program.

He said he hoped to see the day when you can live in freedom, and America and Iran can be good friends and close partners in the cause of peace.Ahmadinejad took the podium hours later, denouncing U.S. policies in Iraq and Lebanon and accusing Washington of abusing its power in the Security Council to punish others while protecting its own interests and allies.The hard-line leader insisted that his nation's nuclear activities are transparent, peaceful and under the watchful eye of inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog. He also reiterated his nation's commitment to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.Earlier this month, Ahmadinejad proposed a debate with Bush at the General Assembly's ministerial meeting after the White House dismissed a previous TV debate proposal as a diversion from serious concerns over Iran's nuclear program.

But even though the two leaders spoke from the same podium, they skipped each other's addresses and managed to avoid direct contact during the ministerial meeting.Providing an unusual backdrop, Thailand's military staged a bloodless coup while Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra was in New York. Thaksin initially switched speaking slots so he could make his speech on Tuesday evening, a day earlier than planned, but later canceled the address.

Pakistan's President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, a staunch U.S. ally who spoke shortly after Bush, urged the world to confront the plague of terrorism head-on and end conflicts in the Islamic world to eliminate the desperation and injustice that breed extremism. Unless we end foreign occupation and suppression of Muslim peoples, he said, terrorism and extremism will continue to find recruits among alienated Muslims in various parts of the world, he said, and the top priority should be ending the tragedy of Palestine.

As speaker after speaker expressed concern about the rise of terrorism in the world, Costa Rican President Oscar Arias, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, warned that military spending was not the answer. He said that more than $200 billion had been added to global military spending since the Sept. 11 attacks five years ago. There is not a single indicator that suggests that this colossal increase is making the world more secure and human rights more widely enjoyed, he said. On the contrary, we feel more and more vulnerable and fragile. The crisis in the ravaged Sudanese region of Darfur also was on the sideline agenda Wednesday at the United
Nations, with the African Union's Peace and Security Council scheduled to discuss breaking the deadlock over a plan to replace an AU force with U.N. peacekeepers.

The Sudanese president said his country will not allow the United Nations to take control of peacekeepers in Darfur under any circumstance, claiming that rights groups have exaggerated the crisis there in a bid for more cash. But Omar al-Bashir did say that the African Union, which now runs the peacekeeping mission in Darfur, should be allowed to augment its forces with more logistics, advisers and other support. We want the African Union to remain in Darfur until peace is re-established in Sudan, al-Bashir said at a news conference. Those comments suggest that the African Union will not face any resistance in renewing the peacekeeping force's mandate, which expires on Sept. 30. In her speech to the General Assembly, Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf said the stalemate over whether a U.N. or AU force should be deployed demonstrates a lack of international will to address the sufferings and yearnings of the citizens and residents of Darfur.

Saying the U.N.'s obligation to protect the helpless and innocent must remain paramount, she called on the Security Council to act under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, which allows military intervention, to restore peace, security and stability to Darfur.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

MANY INVOLVED IN PEACE PROCESS

Well the Many in Daniel 9:27 is coming together. It will be Israel/Palestinians and Many (Arabs) as well in the future 7 year peace treaty SIGNING.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

VERSE 27 SHALL CONFIRM THE COVENANT WITH MANY FOR ONE WEEK (1X7=7 YEAR TREATY).

U.N. Council to Meet on Arab Peace Plan
By EDITH M. LEDERERThe Associated PressTuesday, September 19, 2006; 6:51 AM

UNITED NATIONS -- Despite U.S. reluctance, the U.N. Security Council plans to hold a meeting of foreign ministers Thursday to discuss an Arab League proposal to revive the Mideast peace process with a goal of ending all Arab-Israeli conflicts.But the outcome is uncertain because the United States, Israel's closest ally, prefers leaving such negotiations in the hands of the so-called Quartet that drafted the road map to Palestinian peace in 2003.Framed by a tapestry copy of Pablo Picasso's Guernica American Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton addresses members of the media at United Nations headquarters, Monday, Sept. 18, 2006. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer) (Mary Altaffer - AP)

We still don't see the real utility of the meeting,U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said. We have not agreed completely with the idea.Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa said the Arab proposal is not an attempt to sideline the Quartet, rather would go beyond it by also seeking an end to Israel's conflicts with the Lebanese and Syrians.We are talking about the Arab-Israeli conflict, not only the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.We want to end this conflict,he said.The Quartet aimed to establish a Palestinian state by 2005, but Israel and the Palestinians have failed to carry out the parallel steps in the peace plan and it has languished.

Bolton said the United States had proposed a meeting of the Quartet, which will be held on Wednesday, and we think that's the appropriate vehicle to use.The Arab League proposal asks Secretary-General Kofi Annan to prepare a report on possible mechanisms to resume direct negotiations in close consultation with the parties to the conflict, states in the region and the Quartet.

Greece's U.N. Ambassador Adamantios Vassilakis, the council president for September, said he proposed elements for a formal council statement to be read at the end of the meeting, but members were still divided, and we need to work more.What will be the outcome, I cannot tell you yet, he said. A presidential statement, which becomes part of the Security Council record, requires the support of all 15 council members.Ido Aharoni, Israel's Foreign Ministry spokesman, said if the ministerial session goes ahead, Israel is considering its participation in the meeting.Council members discussed the proposed ministerial meeting early Monday afternoon and Britain's U.N. Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry said afterwards that it's definitely going to take place.But he said it isn't clear whether there is going to be an outcome.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

ISRAEL WANTS PERMANENT DIALOGUE

MUSLIM NATIONS

EZEKIEL 38:1-12
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog,(RULER) the land of Magog,(RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW)and
Tubal,(TOBOLSK) and prophesy against him,3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal:4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY)of the north quarters, and all his bands:(SUDAN,AFRICA) and many people with thee.7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them.8 After many days thou shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of Israel, which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them.9 Thou shalt ascend and come like a storm, thou shalt be like a cloud to cover the land, thou, and all thy bands, and many people with thee.(RUSSIA-EGYPT AND MUSLIMS)10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:11 And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that
are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.

ISAIAH 17:1
1 The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.

PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.5 For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)6 The tabernacles of Edom,and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, and the Hagarenes;7 Gebal, and Ammon,(JORDAN) and Amalek;(SYRIA) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)

WORLD TERRORISM

GENESIS 6:11-13
11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

2 PETER 2:5
5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

2 PETER 3:7
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men

LEVITICUS 26:16
16 I also will do this unto you; I will even appoint over you( sudden) terror, consumption, and the burning ague, that shall consume the eyes, and cause sorrow of heart: and ye shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it.

GENESIS 16:11-12
11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

ISAIAH 33:1,18-19 Woe to thee that spoilest,(destroys) and thou wast not spoiled;(destroyed) and dealest treacherously, and they dealt not treacherously with thee! when thou shalt cease to spoil,(destroy) thou shalt be spoiled;(destroyed) and when thou shalt make an end to deal treacherously, they shall deal treacherously with thee.18 Thine heart shall meditate terror. Where is the scribe? where is the receiver? where is he that counted the towers?19 Thou shalt not see a fierce people, a people of a deeper speech than thou canst perceive; of a stammering tongue, that thou canst not understand.

JOHN 16:2
2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

US, Israel caution Abbas over unity deal with Hamas 2 hours, 29 minutes ago

UNITED NATIONS (AFP) - The United States and Israel have put pressure on Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas not to cut a deal with a Hamas government that refuses to renounce violence and recognize Israel. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Israel Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni told Abbas in separate talks in New York that there could be no compromise on the conditions that had been set by the international community.

Secretary Rice was very clear about the need to see the three Quartet principles without anything else,Saeb Erekat, a Palestinian lawmaker and close associate of the Palestinian leader, told reporters.

He was speaking after more than an hour of talks between Abbas and Livni, their first in five months, after an earlier meeting between the Palestinian leader and the top US diplomat.Livni told reporters: From Israel's perspective, there is a need for any future Palestinian government to meet completely the three requirements of the international community.After Hamas won the Palestinian election in January, the diplomatic Quartet -- the United States,Russia,European Union and United Nations, which drew up the Middle East peace road map demanded that the Palestinian government acknowledge Israel's right to exist, renounce violence and recognise past agreements with the Jewish state.

Hamas is considered a terrorist organization by the United States because of its armed conflict with Israel.Abbas said earlier he was freezing talks over a national unity government with Hamas because of disagreements over past peace deals with Israel.He is set to resume discussions on his return from New York.The diplomatic moves on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly came ahead of talks between US President George W. Bush and Abbas on Wednesday.It is to be their first meeting since October 2005.

Meanwhile, Arab countries are pushing for a new mechanism to relaunch the stalled Middle East peace process after the UN-brokered truce that ended a month-long war between Israel and Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon last month.At their request, the UN Security Council has tentatively scheduled a ministerial session on Thursday to discuss a mechanism based on a 2002 Arab initiative, which proposed a normalization of relations with Israel in exchange for the return of all land occupied by the Jewish state since 1967.Abbas also committed to Livni Monday to make maximum efforts to help free an Israeli soldier held by Palestinian
militants, his aide said.Abbas called it a very, very positive meeting. We talked a lot about everything, while Livni said the encounter had been a very good, important and constructive meeting.

Palestinian governing movement Hamas, whose armed wing claimed joint responsibility for the June 25 raid in which Corporal Gilad Shalit was captured, said Sunday that progress has been made in talks to release the conscript.Erekat said Abbas had committed to making the maximum efforts to close this chapter (the Israeli soldier) along with the cessation of violence by the two sides.Livni said firstly, and the most important issue for Israel is the unconditional release of Shalit. Shalit's seizure sparked a massive Israeli military offensive into Gaza, with the aim of retrieving him and also stopping militants firing rockets into Israel. Israel's contacts with
the Palestinian leadership have since been virtually frozen. And talk of Abbas' Fatah faction joining a new government with Hamas has raised new western fears over the Middle East peace process. Livni said the road map to Middle East process and ways to promote the peace process had been discussed.

LAND FOR PEACE

JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).27 And he( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge
shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be
a vexation only to understand the report.

DANIEL 8:23-25
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king (EU DICTATOR) of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences,(FROM THE OCCULT) shall stand up.24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power:(SATANS POWER) and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes;(JESUS) but he shall be broken without hand.

DANIEL 11:36-40
36 And the king shall do according to his will;(EU PRESIDENT) and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS A EUROPEAN JEW) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(HES A MILITARY GINIUS) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds (CONTROL HEZBOLLAH,AL-QUAIDA MURDERERS ETC) with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide
the land for gain. 40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south(EGYPT) push at him:(EU DICTATOR PROTECTING ISRAELS SECURITY) and the king of the north(RUSSIA) shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships;
and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.

Israel wants permanent Abbas dialogue By LAURIE COPANS,
Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 53 minutes ago

JERUSALEM -Israel wants to reopen a serious dialogue with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and work with him to establish a Palestinian state, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said Tuesday. Livni spoke after meeting Monday with Abbas in New York, in the first working session between high-ranking Israeli and Palestinian officials in four months. Their talks coincided with Abbas' efforts to persuade the Palestinians' Hamas rulers to moderate their anti-Israel policies and join with his Fatah party in a coalition government.I don't see this as one meeting and each side checks off a box and goes home,Livni told Israel's Army Radio about her
talks with Abbas on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly. The idea is to establish a permanent channel of dialogue.

We have a goal ... of achieving a two-state solution,she said.

Israel's dialogue with the Palestinians has been largely frozen since Hamas, which is sworn to Israel's destruction, won Palestinian parliamentary elections in January. But Israel considers Abbas — a moderate elected separately in 2005 — an acceptable negotiating conduit.It was a very, very positive meeting with Mrs. Livni. We talked (about) everything, Abbas said after the talks at the United Nations.Abbas and Livni discussed reopening the dialogue between Israeli and Palestinian officials, including a meeting between Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, as soon as possible, Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said.Abbas agreed to an unconditional meeting with Olmert that would be part of a series of meetings between Palestinian and Israeli officials, he said.

The two leaders were about to hold their first working meeting in June when Hamas-affiliated militants captured an Israeli soldier, derailing all efforts at talks.Abbas promised Livni to exert maximum effort to secure the soldier's release, Erekat said.Livni said she told Abbas that Israel stood firm by its refusal to deal with Hamas until it renounces violence, recognizes signed peace agreements and recognizes Israel. Hamas has resisted these demands, though, and that could compromise the establishment of a coalition government and dash Abbas' hopes of restoring hundreds of millions of dollars in international funding cut off after Hamas took power.Yielding to growing domestic pressure, Hamas agreed last week to form a coalition with Fatah in the hopes of lifting the economic boycott, which has made it impossible for the government to pay employees who provide for one-third of all Palestinians.

But the U.S. and EU want clearer statements on the new government's commitment to peace efforts.Although Israel has postponed its plan to withdraw from large areas of the West Bank, the government is interested in advancing in the U.S.-backed road map peace plan that outlines the formation of a Palestinian state, Livni said.The road map is still on the table, she said.The plan aimed to establish a Palestinian state by 2005, but Israel and the Palestinians have failed to carry out their obligations and it has languished.Public support in Israel for the West Bank pullback sank after the militants allied with Hamas tunneled from the Gaza Strip into Israel to kidnap the soldier at an army post. The attack, which came after Israel withdrew last year
from the Gaza Strip, sparked a large military offensive in the Palestinian area in which more than 200 Palestinians have been killed, most of them militants.

Israelis have also been skeptical of any serious moves toward reconciliation with Arabs since a 34-day war in Lebanon against Hezbollah guerrillas who carried out a cross-border attack in mid-July, killing three Israeli soldiers and capturing two.A poll published Tuesday showed that two-thirds of Palestinians back Hamas' refusal to recognize Israel, although support for the group has dropped since it took power in March from 47 percent to 38 percent. According to the poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, 54 percent of those questioned were dissatisfied with the overall performance of the Hamas government, with 69 percent
saying they were displeased by the dire economic situation. The poll questioned 1,268 adults in face-to-face interviews in mid-September and had a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

In other news:

• Israeli security officials said Defense Minister Amir Peretz ordered the demolition of about 45 structures in unauthorized Jewish settlement outposts in the West Bank, and that they would be torn down within weeks. Peretz's earlier plans to remove 12 outposts were shunted aside in July after the war in Lebanon broke out. Israel promised the U.S. three years ago to take down about two dozen outposts erected after Ariel Sharon became prime minister in 2001, but little action has been taken.

• Masked gunmen entered the office of the official Palestinian WAFA news agency in the southern Gaza town of Khan Younis and beat up the bureau chief, Amru al-Farra. The gunmen demanded that WAFA, which is considered to be pro-Fatah, be more objective in its reporting.

Monday, September 18, 2006

CALIPHATES CAPITAL WILL BE JERUSALEM

Israeli Islamist Leader: Caliphate´s Capital Will Be Jerusalem
By Nissan Ratzlav-Katz(INN)

Reiterating a position he has expressed in the past, the leader of the northern branch of the Islamic Movement declared that a new Caliphate will soon arise, with its capital in Jerusalem. The Islamist leader, Sheikh Raed Salah, made the prediction Friday night, at the 11th annual conference of the Israeli Islamic Movement, in the southern Galilee city of Um El-Fahm. Tens of thousands attended the event, including the Palestinian Authority-appointed mufti, Ikrima Sabri, and an archbishop of the Greek-Orthodox Church. Arab League Secretary-General Amr Musa of Egypt sent his regards to the gathering, as well.The conference was held under the slogan Al-Aksa [the Temple Mount mosque] is in Danger, which has been utilized as a theme repeatedly at Islamic gatherings in recent years, harking back to incitement that preceded Arab massacres of Jews in the pre-State period.

Likening Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem to that of past non-Muslim rulers in the region, Salah said, The Israeli occupation will leave Jerusalem soon. It will happen sooner than is thought.To aid in that process, Salah repeated a call of his from several months ago for Arab and Muslim states and organizations to establish a special fund aimed at saving Al-Aksa Mosque and Jerusalem from the Jews. Salah also claimed that former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and President Moshe Katzav are suffering, each in their own way, because of their plans to attack the Al-Aksa Mosque on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem's Old City. Sheikh Raed Salah was arrested, along with four other leaders of the Islamic movement and the mayor of Umm El-Fahm, in 2003 on charges of belonging to a terrorist group, passing information to an enemy, contact with a foreign element (an Iranian intelligence operative stationed in Lebanon), conspiracy to commit a crime, money laundering, and other security and corporate crimes.

Friday, September 15, 2006

KISSINGER NEW MIDEAST ROADMAP

Middle East NewsEU must seize slight chances in Mideast:
SteinmeierSep 15, 2006, 11:02 GMT

Brussels - The European Union must seize the current situation in the Middle East for a revival of the Middle East peace process, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said Friday, warning that chances for a political restart are limited. The window of opportunities for a political restart which could mean the renewal of the peace process is ... only slightly open,
Steinmeier said. Arriving for a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels, Steinmeier also called on the bloc's governments to broadly support the Lebanese government. When the central government in Lebanon is strong it leaves less room for organizations that in the last years have turned out to be a state inside the state,Steinmeier said in reference to the radical Islamist Hizbollah movement. We have to seek for a political restart in Lebanon,he added.

Finnish Foreign Minister erkki Tuomioja told reporters earlier that the new Palestinian government could be a 'valid negotiating partner' if it complied with international demands, We have a new government, we have a new situation and I think we should use it to go back to the peace process,Tuomioja added. Finland currently holds the rotating EU presidency. Previous peace agreements outlined by the so-called Mideast Quartet - the United States, the United Nations, the EU and Russia - demand that the Palestinian Authority renounces violence, recognizes Israel and abides by past peace deals. The time has come to enlarge the dialogue and to make our principles clear to all sides of the Palestinian people,' said Austrian foreign minister Ursula Plassnik.

Our principle has always been the principle of dialogue and talking to each other,Plassnik said, adding: We should reconsider our position now in view of the national dialogue. British minister for European affairs Jeff Hoon said that the EU wants the agreement between Hamas and Fatah to form a government of national unity recognizes the principles set out by the Quartet. I do think we need to be positive, we want to be engaged,Hoon said, adding: We want to move things along, we want to see a return to the Road Map and we want to see progress in the region.

However, EU foreign ministers are unlikely to take a formal decision on the bloc's
future ties with a new Palestinian government of national unity. Diplomats have said the EU needs to see what the incoming national unity government stands for and what commitments it is prepared to make. © 2006 dpa - Deutsche Presse-Agentur

EU speaker touts role of Europe in peace processMilitary action is not the means'Daily Star staff,Saturday, September 16, 2006

BEIRUT: Europe is playing a key role in achieving a sustainable peace in the Middle East, the president of the European Parliament said Friday. Josep Borrell arrived in Beirut on Thursday for two days of talks with officials here on the humanitarian crisis caused by the recent war with Israel.The EU has stressed military action is not the means to resolve the Middle East conflict,Borrell said after a meeting Friday with Premier Fouad Siniora and EU Ambassador Patrick Renauld.Nobody can win a war in the Middle East; that's why the EU is calling for the resumption of peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine, he said.The European speaker added that he hoped an expanded peacekeeping force in South Lebanon would be the first step toward regional peace.I hope a European military presence [in the South] would be the first step toward Europe's role in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian crisis, which is the cause of Lebanon's suffering,he said, also stressing the need to resolve the issue of the Shebaa Farms. http://www.dailystar.com.lb

Borrell said he invited Siniora to attend a session of the European Parliament on September 27 in Strasbourg that would focus on the means to help Lebanon overcome the current crisis and establish peace in the region.The speaker met later on Friday with Culture Minister Tarek Mitri, who is filling in for Foreign Minister Fawzi Salloukh while the latter is in Cuba for a Non-Aligned Movement Summit.My visit to Lebanon is to show the European Parliament's commitment to help the country achieve stability, Borrell said after the second meeting.The Europeans were the first to call for an immediate cease-fire and for the deployment of a
strong European military force,he added.

Mitri said the meeting focused on Lebanon's adherence to Resolution 1701 and Europe's
contribution to UNIFIL.Before leaving Friday, Borrell toured Beirut's southern suburbs to see firsthand the level of destruction caused by Israeli attacks. - The Daily Star

New roadmap for Mideast
BY HENRY A. KISSINGER 15 September 2006

TWO misconceptions dominate public discussion on the crisis in Lebanon. The first is that Hezbollah is a traditional terrorist organisation operating covertly outside the law. The second is that the ceasefire marks an end to the war in Lebanon. Neither of these views is valid.Hezbollah is, in fact, a metastasisation of the Al Qaeda pattern. It acts as an overt state within a state. It
commands an army much stronger and far better equipped than Lebanon’s on Lebanese soil, in defiance of two UN resolutions.

Financed and trained by Iran, it fights wars with organised units against a major adversary. As a Shia party, it has ministers in the government of Lebanon who do not consider themselves bound by its decisions. A non-state entity on the soil of a state with all the attributes of a state and backed by the major regional power is a new phenomenon in international relations.

Since its creation, Hezbollah has been almost permanently at war. The first of three Hezbollah wars occurred when, in 1983, its attack on US barracks killed 241 Marines and convinced America to withdraw its peacekeeping forces from Beirut. The second was a campaign of harassment that induced Israeli forces to withdraw from southern Lebanon in 2000. The third was inaugurated this year with the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers inside Israel that led to the Israeli retaliatory attack. We are witnessing a carefully conceived assault, not isolated terrorist attacks, on the international system of respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. The
creation of organisations like Hezbollah and Al Qaeda symbolises that transnational loyalties are replacing national ones.

The driving force behind this challenge is the jihadist conviction that it is the existing order that is illegitimate, not the Hezbollah and jihad method of fighting it. For the jihad’s adherents, the battlefield cannot be defined by frontiers based on principles of world order they reject; what we call terror is, to the jihadists, an act of war to undermine illegitimate regimes.

A ceasefire does not end this war; it inaugurates a new phase in it. This twin assault on the global order, by the combination of radical states with transnational non-state groups sometimes organised as militias, is a particular challenge in the Middle East, where frontiers denote few national traditions and are not yet a century old. But it could spread to wherever militant, radical Islamic groups exist. Leaders therefore are torn between following the principles of the existing international order on which their economy may depend, or yielding (if not joining) the transnational movement on which their political survival may depend.

The crisis in Lebanon is a classic case of that pattern. By the rules of the old international order, the war technically took place between two states — Lebanon and Israel — which, in fact, have very few conflicting interests. Their sole territorial dispute concerns a small strip of territory, Shebaa Farms, occupied by Israel from Syria in 1967 and indirectly certified as not being part of Lebanon by the UN in 2000. The UN ceasefire resolution affirms that the crisis was provoked by Hezbollah, which had kept the Lebanese armed forces out of the southern part of Lebanon facing Israel for thirty years. Yet by the existing international rules, the secretary of state was obliged to negotiate on the ceasefire with the Lebanese government, which controlled no forces in a position to implement it while the only forces capable of doing so have never formally accepted it. The real goals of the Lebanese war were transnational and not Lebanese: to overcome the millennia-old split between Sunnis and Shia on the basis of hatred for Israel and America; to relieve diplomatic pressure on Iran’s nuclear program; to demonstrate that Israel would be held hostage if pressure became too acute; to establish Iran as a major factor in any negotiation; to scuttle the Palestinian peace process; to show that Syria — the second major sponsor of Hezbollah — remained in a position to pursue its ambitions in Lebanon.

This is why the balance sheet of the war in Lebanon must be assessed in large part in psychological and political terms. No doubt the war inflicted heavy casualties on Hezbollah. The overriding psychological reality, however, is that Hezbollah remained intact and that Israel proved unable (or unwilling) either to suppress the rocket attacks on its territory or to gear its military power to political objectives capable of providing bargaining positions after the cessation of hostilities. Much of the discussion over observance of the ceasefire applies traditional verities to an unprecedented situation. One of the principals in the war is not a party to the ceasefire and has refused either to disarm or to release the two Israeli prisoners it kidnapped, as called for in the UN resolution. The countries needed to enforce the agreement have been ambivalent because of the importance they attach to relations with Iran, their fear of terrorist attacks on their own territory, and, to a lesser extent, their interest in improving relations with Syria.

The mandate for the UN force in southern Lebanon reflects these hesitations. The secretary-general of the UN, Kofi Annan, has declared that the mission of the UN force is not to disarm Hezbollah but to encourage a political process that, in his words, must be achieved through an internal Lebanese consensus, a political process for which the new UNIFIL (United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon) is not and cannot be a substitute. Syria has declared that it would consider the deployment of UNIFIL forces along its borders as a hostile act, and the UN has acquiesced. How is the political process going to work when the UN force is precluded
from dealing with the most probable challenges? The Lebanese army — composed largely of Shia and armed with obsolescent weapons — is in no position to disarm Hezbollah or to control the Syrian border. To compound these complexities, Hezbollah, as a political party, participates in the Lebanese parliament and, on the ministerial level, in the central government. Both institutions generally make decisions by consensus. Hezbollah thus has at least a blocking veto on those issues on which the cooperation of the Beirut government is needed for enforcement.

Hezbollah’s likely next move will be an attempt to dominate the Beirut government by intimidation and using the prestige gained in the war, manipulating democratic procedures. In such a situation, Iran and Syria will be in a stronger position to shape the rules of the ceasefire than the UN forces, which — as experience shows — are likely to be withdrawn when terrorist attacks inflict casualties. The challenge for American policy and all concerned with world order is to recognise that the ceasefire requires purposeful management. A principal objective must be to prevent the rearmament of Hezbollah or its domination of the Lebanese political process.

Otherwise, the UN force will provide a shield for creating the conditions for another even more dangerous explosion. The war in Lebanon has transformed the position of Israel dramatically. Heretofore the Palestinian issue has for all its intensity been about the traditional principles of the state system: the legitimacy of Israel; the creation of a Palestinian state; the drawing of borders between these entities; the security arrangement and rules for peaceful coexistence.

From Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin’s ‘land for peace’ formula, to Saudi Arabia’s offer of peace and mutual recognition, to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s concept of unilateral withdrawal from occupied territories, the so-called peace process was conceived as culminating in an
internationally accepted peace between internationally recognised states.

Hezbollah and other rejectionist groups are determined to prevent precisely this evolution. Hezbollah, which took over southern Lebanon, and Hamas and various jihadist groups, which marginalised the Palestinian Authority in Gaza, disdain the schemes of moderate Arab and Israeli leaders. They reject the very existence of Israel, not any particular set of borders. One of the consequences is that the traditional peace process is now in shambles. After being attacked with missiles from both Gaza and Lebanon launched by non-state jihadists, Israel will find it difficult to view unilateral withdrawal as a road to peace, nor will it be able under current conditions to find a partner to guarantee security. Finally, in the aftermath of Lebanon, the current Israeli government lacks the authority or public support to withdraw even the 80,000 settlers from the West Bank envisaged in the Sharon plan.

At the same time, an indefinite continuation of the status quo is not sustainable. Some new road map must emerge to underpin the comprehensive Mideast policy that must follow the Lebanon war. To deal with the crisis produced by the combination of non-state fanaticism and state power politics, a joint project among America, Europe, and the moderate Arab states is needed to work out a common approach. Only in this manner can a leadership accepting peaceful coexistence emerge in the occupied territories. Everything returns to the challenge of Iran. It trains, finances, and equips Hezbollah, the state within a state in Lebanon. It finances and supports the Sadr militia, the state within a state in Iraq. It works on a nuclear weapons program, which would drive nuclear proliferation out of control and provide a safety net for the systematic destruction of at least the regional order. The challenge is now about world order more than about adjustments within an accepted framework.

A common Atlantic policy backed by moderate Arab states must become a top priority, no matter how pessimistic previous experience with such projects leaves one. The debate sparked by the Iraq war over American rashness versus European escapism is dwarfed by what the world now faces. Both sides of the Atlantic should put their best minds together on how to deal with the common danger of a wider war merging into a war of civilisations against the background of a nuclear armed Middle East. This cannot be done through ad hoc bargaining over Security Council resolutions; rather, the Security Council resolutions should emerge
from an agreed strategy. Many of the countries in such a grouping have a more optimistic view about the prospects of diplomacy than the American administration. We should be open to these concerns and be prepared to join a serious exploration of prospects for turning away from confrontation. But the European allies need to accept that this process should not be driven by domestic politics or media pressure. It has to include a bottom line beyond which diplomatic flexibility cannot go and a time limit to prevent negotiations from turning into a shield for developing new assaults.

In the Lebanon crisis, one can detect the beginning of such a process. Europe shared enough of the American perception, and America paid enough attention to European concerns, to produce a coordinated diplomacy in the Security Council and to supply a significant peacekeeping force for southern Lebanon. It remains to be seen whether this cooperation can be sustained in the next phase, specifically, whether the UN effort in Lebanon can become a means to deal with the dangers outlined here or become a way to avoid the necessary decisions. This is even more true of the impending Iran negotiations. Ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union, thoughtful observers have wondered whether the Atlantic ties can be maintained in the absence of a commonly perceived danger. We now know that we face the imperative of building a new world order or potential global catastrophe. It cannot be done alone by either side of the Atlantic. Is that realisation sufficient to regenerate a sense of common purpose?

Henry A Kissinger, a former US Secretary of State, played a key role in formulating US foreign policy during the Cold War

Thursday, September 14, 2006

HAMAS APPROVES TALKS WITH ISRAEL

QUARTET TO MEET NEXT WEEK TO DISCUSS LATEST PALESTINIAN SITUATION ANNANNew York, Sep 13 2006 7:00PM

Following an agreement between Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Hamas on forming a unity Government, Secretary-General Kofi Annan said today that the diplomatic Quartet on the Middle East, which includes the United Nations, will meet next week to discuss these developments and possible ways to provide humanitarian assistance to the occupied territory.

[On Monday] I got a call from President Abbas to tell me that they have reached an agreement with Hamas… He also went on to say that the programme they have adopted requires all members of the Government to accept the programme of the Palestine Liberation Organization and all the agreements they had entered into earlier.He felt this decision should satisfy the requirements and the conditions demanded by the international community. If that is indeed the case, he should really allow the international community and the donor community to move ahead very quickly and provide the assistance that the Palestinian people need.

International donors have baulked at funding the Hamas-led Palestinian Government because it has yet to renounce violence and the continuing conflict with Israel has led to what Mr. Annan described as a very desperate and serious situation in the occupied territory.We have a temporary mechanism, which allows some money to go in, but to pay for humanitarian services, but not for salaries. It’s become a very complex situation that the Quartet will be looking at when we meet next week to review the impact of our own policies and what has happened on the ground.

The diplomatic Quartet on the Middle East – comprising the UN, United States, European Union (EU) and the Russian Federation are sponsoring the <"Road'>http://www.un.org/News/dh/mideast/roadmap122002.pdf">Road Map plan for a two-State solution, with Israel and Palestine living side by side in peace. However, Mr. Annan today<"http://www.un.org/apps/sg/offthecuff.asp?nid=940">lamented its lack of progress.I think the Road Map could have been implemented much faster, or we had hoped it would have been implemented much faster. Alas, it has not been. We are going to meet here next week, and we are meeting at a very critical time for the people in Palestine.Over the past few months there have been several high-level UN meetings on the worsening plight of the Palestinians in the occupied territory and last week a UN conference of Civil Society in Support of the Palestinian People adopted a plan of action aimed at addressing their plight, and ahead of next year’s 40th anniversary of the occupation of the Palestinian West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem., 2006-09-13 00:00:00.000

Gaza Strip: Hamas approves talks with Israel By DIAA HADID Associated Press ,9/13/2006

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip -- Hamas officials gave Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas the go-ahead Tuesday for negotiations with Israel, a major shift in the militant Islamic group's position as it works to end its international isolation. An Israeli military court, meanwhile, ordered the release of 19 Hamas officials including Cabinet ministers and lawmakers from an Israeli prison. The men, arrested by Israel after the June 25 capture of Israeli Cpl. Gilad Shalit by Hamas-linked militants, will remain behind bars for several more days pending an appeal by prosecutors. Israel said the court decision was not meant to reward Hamas for its moves toward moderation.

I don't think that right now we would be making gestures of good will for the Hamas. We would be making gestures of good will to Abu Mazen,Israeli government spokeswoman Miri Eisin said, referring to the moderate Abbas by his nickname. Eisin said the courts were independent of the government. Hamas, whose ideology calls for Israel's destruction, reached agreement Monday with Abbas' Fatah Party to form a unity government in an effort to end the financial crisis crippling the Palestinian economy. International donors cut off aid to the Palestinian Authority when Hamas formed its Cabinet six months ago. Hamas is listed as a terror group by Israel and the West.

Abbas has long pushed for a resumption of peace talks with Israel, and Hamas said Tuesday he would have full authority to hold those negotiations. Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, a Hamas leader, said the government itself would not be involved in the talks because negotiations are supposed to be handled by the PLO, led by Abbas. The distinction could allow Hamas to retain its hard-line credentials with the Palestinian street, while the government gains international acceptance. Ghazi Hamad, a spokesman for the Hamas-led government, told Israel's Army Radio in Hebrew that the Palestinians would be ready to establish a state in territories captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast War -- the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem. While Hamad said Hamas would not recognize Israel's right to exist, the joint government is to be based on a platform many believe implies recognition of the Jewish state. Israel, the U.S. and European Union have said Hamas must renounce violence, recognize Israel's right to exist and accept past peace agreements.

Monday, September 11, 2006

OLMERT PROMOTES ROAD MAP

Monday, September 11, 2006 by Staff Writer
Olmert: Israel wants to restart talks with Palestinians

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said yesterday that Israel will look for a way to restart talks with the Palestinians in order to create a new political horizon. Olmert said that Israel will not retreat from the roadmap and the steps stipulated in the plan. The Roadmap is better than any other document that could be produced by the international community and especially the demand to dismantle the terror groups as a condition to any progress,he said. We must not be caught in a deadlock with the Palestinians. We need to find a platform that will give hope and reshape the political horizon.

Olmert also said he is willing to meet with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas with no prior conditions.In the past, they placed preconditions. During the war I suggested that we meet, but it is clear that what I was willing to do before Gilad Shalit was kidnapped I will not do today and as long as he is in captivity, we will not be releasing any Palestinian prisoners.

Meanwhile on the political front, Transportation Minister and member of the Security Cabinet Shaul Mofaz called yesterday to form a National Investigative Committee to probe the failures of the war in Lebanon.

A National Investigative Committee is necessary in order to bring back the trust of the people in the national leadership,Mofaz said in a statement published yesterday. Other committees did not work, and there is no more time to waste. The committee must be formed immediately.

Officials close to Mofaz, who has served both as army chief of staff and defense minister, say he is not worried that the committee will investigate his own performance in those two positions from the time Israel withdrew from Lebanon and until the war. Officials close to Olmert say that the call for an investigation is motivated by politics. Sources in Jerusalem say that Olmert is currently looking into appointing a former judge to head the Government Inquiry Committee in place of Nahum Admoni.

Olmert Pushing Road Map PlanBy Hillel Fendel(INN)

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, in a joint press conference with British Prime Minister Tony Blair on Saturday night, announced he plans to meet - unconditionally - with Abu Mazen in the near future. Blair arrived in Jerusalem late Sabbath afternoon, meeting with Mr. Olmert on what many feel is his farewell tour of the region before his expected resignation next year.Olmert told reporters that he plans to meet with PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) in the near future. Though just last week he said he would not meet with Abbas before captive soldier Gilad Shalit is released, he no longer has set any preconditions for such a meeting.

Olmert expressed his willingness and intention to advance the Quartet's Road Map Plan between Israel and the PA. He announced that the Realignment Plan, his main election campaign platform, was no longer relevant.

The Road Map plan, initiated in 2002, calls for an end to terrorism, an end to Israel's settlement activity, and the formation of a Palestinian state. Ex-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said that the U.S. guaranteed that Israel could retain major settlement blocs in the Shomron, but this has not been borne out by the relevant documents. The plan has not yet made it to its first step.The British leader told reporters that events taking place in the Mideast directly impact his country, as well as the entire world community. Blair expressed his willingness to do whatever possible to advance negotiating efforts between Israel and the PA (Palestinian Authority).

Prime Minister Olmert has said that he now realizes that his Realignment Plan, calling for the dismantling of most of the communities in Judea and Samaria and the handing over of most of the territory to Hamas, is no longer realistic. The Road Map Plan is all Olmert has left on the political horizon, analysts say.Olmert placing the focus of his Saturday night remarks not on
Lebanon or Iran, but on the PA. PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah, who still retains his position despite the fact that Hamas controls the Parliament, is also willing to talk unconditionally with Olmert. Both leaders apparently feel they need each other in order to stay in power.

The Deputy Director of the GSS (Israel's domestic security service), whose name is not known to the public, says that Abbas also needs Hamas cooperation in order to survive. The official told the Cabinet today that Fatah is continuing to crumble in the face of increasing Hamas strength and influence within the internal PA security agencies. Efforts continue to create a unity government of both Hamas and Fatah.

Sunday, September 10, 2006

REVIVED ROME WORLD POWER

THE NEW WORLD ORDER OR ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT HEADED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) IN THE FUTURE.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

THE EUROPEAN UNION DAN CHAPTERS 2 + 7

Only 7 World Empires in History
REV 17: 9-10,
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.(VATICAN , ROME)
10 And there are seven kings:(7) five are fallen,(5 HAVE RULED ALREADY) and one is,(1 IN POWER AT THIS TIME #6 ROME) and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.(THE 7TH IS REVIVED ROME IN THE FUTURE FOR 3 1/2 years of the future 7 YR TREATY).As they say all roads lead to ROME.

This just gives us proof that The EU or REVIVED ROME will control the whole World. With the VATICAN playing a major role or it would not mention the 7 Hills which the VATICAN IS BUILT ON. Oviously The EU will ride to power through the VATICAN and control the world that way. How better to decieve the WORLD through RELIGION, JUST LIKE ISLAM DECIEVES THEIR PEOPLE THROUGH RELIGION INTO THINKING BLOW YOUR SELVES UP AND GET TO HEAVEN. WHEN IN REALITY THEY ARE GOING TO HELL FOR MURDERING. NO 72 VIRGINS IN HELL I CAN GUARENTEE.

In This same way the EU will decieve the WORLD into some kind of nonsence, and the world will believe it. And since beheadings will be a normal happening, Islam is oviously involved in some way. Maybe the next Pope by the name of Peter will be a Muslim, this could account for the take over of Islam at the Vatican, and if he would be a JEWISH Muslim, this could bring ISRAEL real close to the VATICAN in relations. Since this future Dictator does come from the Occult, and Islam is a cult of MURDER AND WORLD DOMINATION.

We will see how GOD lets it play out in the future, since hes in control of everything (thank goodness), no man on Earth.

DANIEL 7:23-24
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast(THE EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADING BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise:(10 NATIONS) and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.(BE HEAD OF 3 KINGS OR NATIONS).

OK SO WE ESTABLISHED BY THESE SCRIPTURES, THE NEW WORLD ORDER WILL BE CONTROLED BY THE ROMANS , THE REVIVED ROMAN EMPIRE OF TODAY IS THE EU.

THE EUROPEAN UNION (DANIEL 2:31-33,36-43, DAN 7:3-8,17)

First From Daniel Chapter 2

1 EGYPT
2 ASSYRIA
3 BABYLON (HEAD OF GOLD) DAN 2:31-32,36-38, DAN 1:1
4 MEDO-PERSIANS (CHEST & ARMS OF SILVER) DAN 2:32,39, DAN 9:1
5 GREECE (WAIST & HIPS OF BRONZE) DAN 2:32,39, DAN 11:2
6 ROME (2 LEGS OF IRON) DAN 2:33,40, ROM 1:6
7 REVIVED ROME (EU) (FEET IRON & CLAY) DAN 2:33,41-43,10 TOES

Now From Daniel Chapter 7

1 EGYPT
2 ASSYRIA
3 BABYLON (LION WITH EAGLES WINGS) DAN 7:4, DAN 1:1
4 MEDO-PERSIANS (BEAR ON HIND LEGS) DAN 7:5, DAN 9:1
5 GREECE (LEOPARD 4 WINGS, 4 HEADS) DAN 7:6, DAN 11:2
6 ROME (HUGE IRON TEETH) DAN 7:7 (10 HORNS), ROM 1:6
7 REVIVED ROME (EU) DAN 7:8,19-20,23-25 10 HORNS, 10 KINGSREV 17:9,12, 10 HORNS, 10 KINGS, 7 HILLS ROME. REV 13:1 BEAST WITH 7 HEADS. THE E.U LEADER OF WORLD GOVERNMENT DAN 2:40-45, 7:7-8,23-25,27, 8:23, REV 13:3,7,8,12,14,16

How the European Union Began!

THE EUROPEAN UNION DAN 2:31-33,36-43, DAN 7:3-8,17,

1 BELGIUM 1957
2 NETHERLANDS 1957
3 LUXUMBOURG 1957
4 FRANCE 1957
5 ITALY 1957
6 GERMANY 1957

THESE 6 RADIFIED BY THE TREATY OF ROME (REVIVED ROMAN EMPIRE) JAN 1,1958

7 IRELAND 1973
8 DENMARK 1973
9 BRITIAN 1973
10 GREECE 1981 MAGIC 10 TOES AND 10 HORNS DAN 7:23-24,REV 17:9,12

11 SPAIN 1986 DAN 7:24

12 PORTUGAL 1986
13 AUSTRIA 1995

AFTER IT REACHES 13, IT GOES TO WORLD GOVERNMENT DAN 2:40-45, 7:7-8,23-25,27, REV 13:3,7,8,12,14,16. THAN IT SOME HOW ENDS UP BACK AT 10 (WORLD REGIONS, I THINK) WHEN JESUS RETURNS TO EARTH TO RULE AND REIGN FROM JERUSLEM. DAN 2:44-45, 7:9-14,26-27.

HOW WILL THE EU DO WORLD CONTROL? THROUGH THE ECONOMY!!!!(MONEY AND TRADE)

REVELATION 13:11-18
11 And I beheld another beast( VATICAN FALSE POPE) coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb,(CHRISTIANITY) and he spake as a dragon.(BUT TALKS SATANIC, A DEFECTOR FROM CHRISTIANITY)
12 And he(FALSE POPE) exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him,(THE JEWISH EU DICTATOR) and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.(THE JEWISH DICTATOR)
13 And he(FALSE POPE) doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he(FALSE POPE) had power to do in the sight of the beast;(EU DICTATOR) saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.(MAKE A CLONE OF THE JEWISH DICTATOR)
15 And he(FALSE POPE) had power to give life unto the image of the beast,(CLONE) that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.(BEHEADED)
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond,(THAT COVERS EVERYONE) to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(COMPUTER CHIP IMPLANT)
17 And that no man might buy or sell,(ECONOMICS) save he that had the mark,(IMPLANT) or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.(6-6-6)( IS IT NOT INTERESTING THAT ROME WAS THE 6TH WORLD EMPIRE IN HISTORY, AND IN ONE OF THE STORIES ON MY SITE HERE IN THE LAST 3 DAYS IT MENTIONS THAT EUROPES TROUBLES COME ON 6S OR 7S.

Interesting Rome was the 6th World empire and Revived rome is the 7th World empire. Food for thought.

Now we see in Daniel 7:23, The EU controls the whole World, and since it will be through the Economy, does TRADING BLOCKS COME TO MIND. SINCE BY PEACE AND PROSPERITY THE DICTATOR DESTROYS MANY. Thats because the countries that connect to the EU have to go by their rules and not the Single countries rules.

So we can see how the EU will be able to Sanction or threaten a country with its Army if it does not apply to EU demands. It can send its Rapid Reaction Force in to settle the score quickly or hold money loans or trading benfits fron countries that won't agree with the EU PRESIDENT (DICTATORS) LAWS.

With the EU making agreements with all the other trading blocks, theres no way that they can't take world control, because they will be involved in all the trading of the World in one way or the other like the Bible says will happen. It will be Rome and only the EU that controls the economies and makes the laws of the World in the future.

THE CLUB OF ROME FOUNDER AURELIO PECCEI WANTS THE WORLD IN 10 REGIONAL TRADING BLOCKS.

HERES WHAT THE WORLD WOULD LOOK LIKE (SINCE THERE WILL BE WORLD GOVERNMENT IN THE FUTURE)

1 CANADA, U.S.A, MEXICO
2 EUROPEAN UNION,WESTERN EUROPE
3 JAPAN
4 AUSTRALIA,NEW ZEALAND, S AFRICA, ISRAEL AND PACIFIC ISLANDS
5 EASTERN EUROPE
6 SOUTHERN, CENTRAL AND LATIN AMERICAS
7 NORTH AFRICA, AND MIDEAST (MOSLEMS)
8 CENTRAL AFRICA
9 SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA
10 CENTRAL ASIA

THE CLUB OF ROME WANTS A WORLD CHARISMATIC DICTATOR (EITHER RELIGIOUS, POLITICAL OR SCIENTIFICAL) TO HEAD THIS WORLD GOVERNMENT. REV 13:3,7-8, DAN 7:23-24

WORLD POWERS IN THE END TIME

NORTH - RUSSIA EZEK 38:1-2, 39:1-2
SOUTH - EGYPT DAN 11:42
EAST - CHINA DAN 11:44,REV 16:12
WEST - EUROPEAN UNION DAN 7:23-24 (NOT THE U.S.A)

HOWS THIS FOR UP TO DATE PROPHESY IN THE BOOK OUR GLOBAL NEIGHBOURHOOD (THE REPORT ON GLOBAL GOVERNANCE) A 28 MEMBER THINKTANK WANTS TO REFORM THE UNITED NATIONS AND ONE THING THEY WANT TO CHANGE FOR THE SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE U.N OR LEADER OF THE U.N IS TO GIVE THE HEAD A 7 YEAR CONTRACT PAGE 293 QUOTE THE APPOINTMENT SHOULD BE FOR A SINGLE TERM OF 7 YEARS.

INCREDIBLE WHEN IN THE FUTURE THIS WORLD POLITICIAN FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION SIGNS A 7 YEAR PEACE TREATY WITH ISRAEL AND MANY NATIONS, YOU THINK THIS THINK TANK JUST DECIDED THIS BY CHANCE, NO WAY BECAUSE JESUS TOLD US WHAT WOULD BE HAPPENING IN THE LAST DAYS AND THINGS TO LOOK FOR.

OLMERT TO MEET WITH ABBAS

Israeli PM Olmert says he'll meet Palestinian presidentLast
Updated Sat, 09 Sep 2006 23:12:18 EDT The Associated Press

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Saturday he would meet Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and work closely with him to advance peace efforts.Olmert said the meeting was not conditional on the release of Cpl. Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier being held captive by militants with links to the ruling Hamas party. But Olmert said no progress would be made in the peace process until the soldier is released, indicating talks with Abbas could help gain Shalit's freedom.Olmert, who spoke after meeting with visiting British Prime Minister Tony Blair, did not say when he would meet Abbas.I assured Prime Minister Blair that I am ready to work closely with ... Mahmoud Abbas,Olmert said at a joint news conference with his British counterpart. I also told Prime Minister Blair that I intend to meet with him [Abbas].Olmert has not met with Abbas since June.

Shalit was captured on June 25 by militants in Gaza who carried out a cross-border raid on a military outpost in southern Israel.Long-stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace talks hit a new obstacle in January when Hamas swept a Palestinian parliamentary election.Blair expressed support for a renewal of Israeli dialogue with Abbas despite the control of the Palestinian parliament and government by Hamas, which refuses to recognize Israel or renounce violence.It's very important that we see what we can do to re-energize this process,said Blair.Blair this week gave in to a fierce rebellion in his Labour Party, reluctantly announcing he would resign within a year. He brushed aside suggestions that his Mideast visit was an effort to distract attention from those woes.People can be as cynical as they like, but I've been passionate about this issue [Mideast peace] ... for many years and I'm not going to stop trying on it,he said.

Blair's handling of last month's fighting between Israel and Hezbollah militants in Lebanon is a major cause of his political troubles. Many in his party were infuriated by his refusal to break ranks with President George W. Bush and call for a swift end to the fighting, interpreting that stance as a tacit backing of Israel's offensive.He has also alienated many in the Palestinian territories, where a group of prominent intellectuals published a statement Thursday saying he would not be welcome in the West Bank.

Blair plans to meet Abbas there Sunday, but will not see Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas or other members of his administration.Haniyeh blasted Blair in a column published Saturday in the London-based Guardian newspaper, accusing him of having one-sided policies that hurt the Palestinians.At the heart of our region's problems is the Israeli occupation, which has brought about endless suffering and disasters. If you wish to do the right thing, Mr. Blair, then work for the end of occupation without further delay,Haniyeh wrote.© The Canadian Press, 2006

Saturday, September 09, 2006

ITALY WANTS TROOPS IN GAZA

THE EU DICTATOR

REVELATION 6:1-2,13:1-3,7-9,16
1 And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see.
2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.(THIS IS THE EU DICTATOR)
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.(7 HEADS ARE THE 7TH WORLD EMPIRE IN HISTORY (THE EU) AS WELL AS THE VATICAN WHICH IS BUILT ON 7 HILLS. 10 HORNS ARE 10 KINGS THAT ARISE FROM THE EU, THEN #11 COMES ON THE SCENE BECOMES THE HEAD OF 3 OUNTRIES AND THEN THE EU DICTATOR, COMES FROM 1 OF THE 3 COUNTRIES THAT RULE FOR THIS TERM. I BELIEVE THE 3 COUNTRIES RULING AT THE TIME ARE SPAIN AND 2 OF THE ORIGINAL 6 THAT STARTED THE EU. FROM 1 OF THESE 3 COUNTRIES COME THE FUTURE EU DICTATOR PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION WHO GUARENTEES ISRAELS SECURITY FOR A LAND FOR PEACE 7 YEAR TREATY.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.(THE JEWISH EU DICTATOR GETS HIS POWER FROM SATAN,HE COMES FROM THE OCCULT).
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.(THE DICTATOR HAS A FALSE RESURRECTION. JUST LIKE JESUS HAD A LITERAL RESURRECTION THIS DICTATOR GETS MURDERED AT THE 3 1/2 YR MARK OF THR 7 YEAR TREATY AND COMES BACK TO LIFE. THIS IS HOW HE CAN CLAIM TO BE GOD AND GET AWAY WITH IT AND CONTROL THE WHOLE EARTH.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

DANIEL 11:36-40
36 And the king shall do according to his will;(EU PRESIDENT) and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS A EUROPEAN JEW) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(HES A MILITARY GINIUS) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds (CONTROL HEZBOLLAH,AL-QUAIDA MURDERERS ETC) with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide the land for gain.
40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south(EGYPT) push at him:(EU DICTATOR PROTECTING ISRAELS SECURITY) and the king of the north(RUSSIA) shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.

EUROPEAN UNION ARMY

DANIEL 7:23-25
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast (EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADING BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings(10 NATIONS) that shall arise: and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.( BE HEAD OF 3 NATIONS)
25 And he (EU PRESIDENT) shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.(3 1/2 YRS)

DANIEL 8:23-25
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king (EU DICTATOR) of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences,(FROM THE OCCULT) shall stand up.
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power:(SATANS POWER) and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes;(JESUS) but he shall be broken without hand.

DANIEL 11:36-39
36 And the king (EU DICTATOR) shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS JEWISH) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.(CLAIM TO BE GOD)
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(WAR) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a strange god,(DESTROY TERROR GROUPS) whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide the land for gain.

REVELATION 19:19
19 And I saw the beast,(EU LEADER) and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse,(JESUS) and against his army.(THE RAPTURED CHRISTIANS)

Italian FM supports sending international observers to Gaza Strip

Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D'Alema expressed Thursday his support to the idea of sending multinational forces to the Palestinian territories, especially the Gaza Strip, which should be decided by the United Nations. Of course we welcome sending these multinational forces to the Palestinian territories, but this decision is the United Nations', D'Alema told reporters in a joint news conference with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank city of Ramallah. D'Alema, however, held that such a decision is not easy to be taken before a ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinians take effect and the peace talks resumed.
The presence of international forces must aim at implementing the agreements rather than acting as an alternative for the agreements, said D'Alema, calling on the international community to offer financial and logistic support to the Palestinians if peace talks with Israel resumed. President Abbas said that there have been talks inside the Arab League on how to revive the peace process and come up with a united Arab stance regarding the frozen peace process. He added that the talks also discuss activating the UN resolutions on the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.

The Palestinian National Authority (PNA) has been working on lifting siege on the Hamas-led government and consequently on the Palestinian people, said Abbas. D'Alema arrived in the Palestinian territories en route from Amman earlier Thursday. He held talks with Abbas before holding the joint press conference. The Italian foreign minister is scheduled to meet Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Tel Aviv, followed by talks with his Israeli counterpart Tzipi Livni on Friday. Source: Xinhua

Italy: PA Will Establish a New Gov’t That Recognizes Israel 11:55 Sep 08, '06 / 15 Elul 5766 (IsraelNN.com)

Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D’Alema told Vice Premier Shimon Peres that the PA (Palestinian Authority) is in the midst of negotiations towards forming a new government, one that will accept the demands of the international community. D’Alema stated that recognition of Israel is included among those demands, as well as a cessation of hostility and terror. He added that he believes that the new PA government will renew negotiations with Israel towards a final status agreement.

One state good: Two states bad08.09.2006 - 09:48 CET By Peter Sain ley Berry

EUOBSERVER / COMMENT - Javier Solana, the European Union's High Representative for Common and Security Policy, reacted sharply to President Chirac's charge last week that the EU had not played a sufficiently robust role in trying to halt the recent Lebanon war. Other EU leaders endorsed his line, accusing Chirac of merely seeking a diversion from his domestic problems.For what it is worth I still think that Chirac was right. The EU, given its importance in the world, is marked by a noticeably lightweight diplomatic punch. And whatever good it may do between times, the Union is not known for its ability to rise to an occasion. Sudden crises always seem to find it at sixes and sevens.

I suggested last week that the EU's strategic interests in the eastern Mediterranean required a somewhat more vigorous policy to promoting peace and stability in that region whose peacefulness and stability continues to deteriorate. The various countries and their several problems are linked. But at their root is the conflict between Arab and Jew over the disputed territory of what was once Palestine; a conflict that has seeded a more general struggle between Islam and the West and between different factions within Islam for the right to lead this struggle.The EU is committed, with a panoply of diplomatic forces, to seeking a solution to this fundamental conflict via the Middle East 'roadmap,' designed to lead, were ever its directions to be followed, to a 'two-state' solution: separate Israeli and Palestinian states living side by side in peace and harmony.

Yet 'two-state' solutions do not have a commendable track record of success, nor a happy history. For it is easier to separate two peoples or two religions than it is to separate the attachment of nations to what they continue to insist is 'their' land. The idea of partitioning states is, moreover, a diplomatic invention of relatively recent origin.It began, perhaps, in the mind of an outsider - a Welsh-speaking Welshman from the mountains of North Wales, who rose from humble beginnings to become Prime Minister of Britain and war leader in 1916. Coming from a small country whose language and culture had long been under severe erosion in a predominantly English Britain, David Lloyd George espoused the cause of small nations, first the South African Boers and later the Belgians.

For him it must have seemed natural to regard non-conformist Wales as somehow partitioned from England behind a fortress of earthworks and mountains. Surely, this was how small nations could breathe and worship securely next to the great neighbours? When the Irish rebellion of 1916 came to settlement with the country broadly divided between Protestant Unionists in the north and republican Catholics in the south, the idea of partition - of a 'two-state' solution - must have seemed natural.And with the distraction first of the Irish civil war and then the Second World War masking events on the ground, partition must have seemed a workable solution when, a quarter of a century later, Britain was faced with a comparable problem: preparing religiously divided India for independence.

Just as the Protestants in northern Belfast had refused Catholic rule from Dublin, so Mr Jinnah's Muslims refused to be governed by a Hindu majority. Going one better than Lloyd George in Ireland, the Attlee government carved India into three, with the bloodiest chaos imaginable erupting. Almost sixty years on Pakistan and India remain deeply distrustful and armed against each other with nuclear weapons; hardly a successful advertisement for the 'two-state' solution.At the same time the wheels had been set in motion for the partition of Palestine to create a Jewish state. That partition has been as unsuccessful as the others in bringing about stability.Paradoxically, one thing that large numbers of Israelis and Palestinians agree upon is the integral nature of the former Palestine. There are many Israelis who are prepared to insist on their right to settlement over the entire territory, while the Palestinians aspire to revert to the status quo ante - the time before Israel existed. Whatever compromises each are prepared to concede in the interests of peace, both populations have wider aspirations. And the only way of reconciling such aspirations would be to seek a one-state solution.

That may sound naïve. Of course Arabs and Jews, with such a legacy of conflict and bitterness, could not live easily together. Nor would Israelis ever wish to surrender democratic control over their own security and livelihoods. Nevertheless, the example of South Africa is instructive. The rich, white inhabitants of Capetown and Johannesburg must have felt equally threatened at one time. And there are self-evidently many common interests across the people and the territory of Israel-Palestine.There is a story from the dark days of the Bosnian War. Three soldiers meet at a crossroads, A Croat, a Serb and a Bosnian. Each prepares to shoot the other two.Up pops a frog. Guys, he says, I will grant each of you one wish. He turns to the Croat who says, I want that Serb soldier - dead. The frog turns to the Serb. I want that Croat soldier - dead. Now comes the Bosnian's turn.Are you going to grant those guys their wishes? he asks. Yes, says the frog. The Bosnian pauses a moment.In that case, he replies, I think I'll have a cup of coffee.
Today if the frog returned the three former combatants might all be drinking coffee and asking the frog instead how it is possible to govern a country with 64 different ministers of education - or whatever the current figure is. The suspicions still run deep, but, with communities protected by federation, Bosnia is making real, if hesitant, progress. And the people have stopped killing each other. Even the greatest partition of all - Europe's Iron Curtain - was ultimately a failure. We should learn from this history and now be seeking to remove partitions wherever they be found rather than extolling new divisions. There are lessons for Cyprus here, too.The author is editor of EuropaWorld

IMPORTANT LINKS