Sunday, September 30, 2012

SUKKOT IN ISRAEL THIS WEEK

LEVIDICUS 23:39-44
39  Also in the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when ye have gathered in the fruit of the land, ye shall keep a feast unto the LORD seven days: on the first day shall be a sabbath, and on the eighth day shall be a sabbath.
40  And ye shall take you on the first day the boughs of goodly trees, branches of palm trees, and the boughs of thick trees, and willows of the brook; and ye shall rejoice before the LORD your God seven days.
41  And ye shall keep it a feast unto the LORD seven days in the year. It shall be a statute for ever in your generations: ye shall celebrate it in the seventh month.
42  Ye shall dwell in booths seven days; all that are Israelites born shall dwell in booths:
43  That your generations may know that I made the children of Israel to dwell in booths, when I brought them out of the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
44  And Moses declared unto the children of Israel the feasts of the LORD.

ZECHARIAH 14:16-21
16  And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King,(JESUS) the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.(SUKKOT)
17  And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.
18  And if the family of Egypt go not up, and come not, that have no rain; there shall be the plague, wherewith the LORD will smite the heathen that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.
19  This shall be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all nations that come not up to keep the feast of tabernacles.
20  In that day shall there be upon the bells of the horses, HOLINESS UNTO THE LORD; and the pots in the LORD’S house shall be like the bowls before the altar.
21  Yea, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah shall be holiness unto the LORD of hosts: and all they that sacrifice shall come and take of them, and seethe therein: and in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts.

THIS SUKKOT STARTS TODAY SEPTEMBER 30,12 AT 11AM EST TILL OCTOBER 7,12 
http://www.jewfaq.org/holiday5.htm 
http://www.jewfaq.org/etrog.htm 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2007/09/sukkot-tabernaclesbooths-day-1.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2007/09/sukkot-tabernacles-booths-day-2.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2007/09/sukkot-shabbat-sabbath.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2007/09/sukkot-tabernacles-booths-day-4.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2007/10/sukkot-tabernacle-booths-day-5.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2007/10/sukkot-tabernacles-booths-day-6.html 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2007/10/sukkot-tabernacle-booths-day-7.html 
http://www.jewfaq.org/holiday6.htm 
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2007/10/sukkot-tabernacles-booths-day-8.html

Thursday, September 27, 2012

NO NAME BALLESTINIANS WANT JERUSALEM DIVIDED BY FORCE FROM THE WORLD NATIONS

 ZECHARIAH 12:1-5 King James Bible
1 The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.
2 Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem.
3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.
4 In that day, saith the LORD, I will smite every horse with astonishment, and his rider with madness: and I will open mine eyes upon the house of Judah, and will smite every horse of the people with blindness.
5 And the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, The inhabitants of Jerusalem shall be my strength in the LORD of hosts their God.

JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(WW3 STARTS BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AND ISRAELIS UPROOTED FROM THEIR GOD GIVIN LAND)

ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)

ZECHARIAH 14:1-9 King James Bible
1 Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.
2 For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.
3 Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle.

ISAIAH 56:5
5 Even unto them (ISRAELIS) will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name,(ISRAEL) that shall not be cut off.

ISAIAH 51:3-4
3  For the LORD shall comfort Zion:(JERUSALEM) he will comfort all her waste places;(FROM NUCLEAR WAR) and he will make her wilderness like Eden,(I BELIEVE THE EZEKIEL-4TH TEMPLE WILL BE BUILT 25 MILES FROM THE CURRENT TEMPLE MOUNT AFTER JESUS RULE FOR THE 1,000 YRS FROM JERUSALEM) and her desert like the garden of the LORD; joy and gladness shall be found therein, thanksgiving, and the voice of melody.(PRAISE TO JESUS IN THE DESERT-COULD BE THE NEW JERUSALEM-4TH TEMPLE BUILT 25 MILES INTO THE DESERT FROM THE CURRENT TEMPLE MOUNT.SINCE EZEKIELS TEMPLE IS WAY TO BIG FOR THE CURRENT TEMPLE MOUNT)
4  Hearken unto me, my people;(ISRAEL) and give ear unto me, O my nation:(ISRAEL) for a law shall proceed from me,(JESUS IN JERUSALEM) and I will make my judgment to rest for a light of the people.(ISRAEL AND THE WORLD)

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.

Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.

12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE


ABBAS WAS PUTTING PRESSURE ON ALL USELESS U.N MEMBERS TO PRESSURE ISRAEL INTO DIVIDING JESRUSALEM AND GIVE THE NO NAME BALLESTINIAN ARABS A STATE OF THEIR OWN.OF COURSE ABBAS JUST SPEWED LIES AGAINST ISRAEL AT EVERY LINE.

 U.N SPEECHES
ISRAEL-BENJAMIN NETANYAHU(ISRAEL-JERUSALEM TOGETHER FOREVER)
http://webtv.un.org/watch/israel-general-debate-67th-session/1864725272001/
NO NAME ARABS-MAMOOD ABBAS (ALL LIES LIKE USUAL FROM ABBAS)
http://webtv.un.org/watch/palestine-general-debate-67th-session/1864725278001/
EU-HERMAN VAN ROMPUY
http://webtv.un.org/watch/european-union-general-debate-67th-session/1862972630001/
EGYPT-MOHAMID MORSY
http://webtv.un.org/watch/egypt-general-debate-67th-session/1862962065001/
IRAN-MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD
http://webtv.un.org/watch/iran-general-debate-67th-session/1862691592001/
SPAIN-MARIANO RAJOY BREY
http://webtv.un.org/watch/iran-general-debate-67th-session/1862691592001/

PEACE AND SECURITY IN THE MIDEAST
http://webtv.un.org/watch/peace-and-security-in-the-middle-east-security-council-6841st-meeting/1863040194001/

SEPT 27,12
Meanwhile, president Mahmud Abbas, a year after making an historic appeal for UN recognition of Palestinian statehood in the absence of peace talks that last collapsed in 2010, is expected to return to the assembly with a more modest goal.Abbas wants to see Palestine recognized as a non-state member with pre-1967 borders encompassing the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.“We want Palestine back on the map, on the 1967 lines, with east Jerusalem as its capital, carried by 150 to 170 nations,” Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat told journalists last week.The Palestinians see this as the basis for border negotiations with Israel on a permanent solution to their conflict, but Israel and the United States oppose any recognition before the terms of a final deal are agreed.
http://www.omglobe.com/2012/09/27/israeli-palestinian-leaders-to-make-un-pitches/

LISTEN LIVE TO NETANYAHUS U.N SPEECH
http://webtv.un.org/ 


Bloomberg News

Palestinian Abbas Pares His Statehood Aspirations at UN

By Flavia Krause-Jackson and Calev Ben-David on September 27, 2012
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas appeared to put off efforts to achieve full statehood at the United Nations as he told the world body time is running out for a lasting peace with Israel.The 77-year-old Abbas, facing a cash crisis at home, returned today to the setting where last year he waved an application for statehood recognition from the podium of the United Nations General Assembly. This time, Abbas is seeking a limited upgrade from observer “entity” to “non-member state” in the 193-member General Assembly.
Abbas offered no timeline and gave little sense of urgency, an indication he will hold off on any new initiatives until after the U.S. elections in November.“We have begun intensive consultations with various regional organizations and member states aimed at having the General Assembly adopt a resolution considering the State of Palestine as a non-member state of the United Nations during this session,” Abbas said in the UN hall.“In our endeavor, we do not seek to delegitimize an existing State -- that is Israel; but rather to assert the state that must be realized -- that is Palestine,” he said in the English text of his remarks.While becoming a non-member state may open the door for the Palestinian Authority to sign treaties such as the Rome Statute that set up the International Criminal Court, it would alienate the U.S., the UN’s biggest financial contributor and a key aid donor to the Palestinians.When the Palestinian Authority was accepted last year into the UN cultural agency Unesco, best known for its designation of “world heritage” sites, the U.S. response was to cut off funding that provides almost a quarter of the agency’s budget. The U.S. has said that American law would require similar cutoffs for any UN agency that grants the Palestinians the same status as member states.

Netanyahu’s Appearance

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who last year devoted his rhetoric to fending off the Palestinian statehood bid, this year is focusing his attention on convincing the leaders gathered that military action may be required to stop Iran’s nuclear program from advancing.The dispute over Iran has drawn attention away from the difficulties facing the Palestinians.Deteriorating economic conditions in the West Bank have fueled social-welfare protests. In the Gaza Strip, the Palestinians say the situation is becoming untenable.
Palestinians are also no closer to achieving statehood, either in terms of territory or UN recognition, and the Israeli- Palestinian peace process is moribund.

‘Racist Israel’

Abbas acknowledged as much today, attacking Netanyahu for not wanting to engage in “serious” peace negotiations. The last round of direct talks broke down in 2010 over the issue of limiting Jewish settlements in Palestinian areas.“Developments over the past year have confirmed what we have persistently drawn attention to and warned of: the catastrophic danger of the racist Israeli settlement of our country, Palestine,” he said.In what appeared to be a gesture to Netanyahu, Abbas cited the Holy Land’s connection to Muhammed, Jesus and Abraham. Last year he omitted Abraham, the biblical progenitor of both Jews and Muslims, from his UN address -- a slight noted by Netanyahu when he said, “We are both sons of Abraham.”Expressing “anger” at the state of affairs, Abbas said chances for a two-state solution were disappearing. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon this week also said “the door may be closing” on that option.“Despite all the complexities of the prevailing reality and all the frustrations that abound, we say before the international community: there is still a chance -- maybe the last -- to save the two-state solution and to salvage peace,” Abbas said.-- With assistance from Fadwa Hodali in Ramallah Editors: Terry Atlas, Larry Liebert
To contact the reporters on this story: Flavia Krause-Jackson in United Nations at fjackson@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Walcott at jwalcott9@bloomberg.net

Monday, September 24, 2012

WHAT IS QE 3 OR UNLIMITED EASING

What is "SECRET UE" anyway?

Today @ 08:44 SEPT 24,12 By Andrew Rettman
BRUSSELS - EU countries have a protocol for sharing official "secrets." But people's motives for classifying EU files are not always pure and the number of really hush hush papers in Brussels is tiny.The EU Council - where member states meet to talk about everything from the euro-crisis to Iran oil sanctions - has five levels of document security: LIMITE UE, RESTREINT UE, CONFIDENTIEL UE, SECRET UE and TRES SECRET UE.The "UE" means "Union Europeene" - by custom, the label is always in French, even though the "UE" bit is normally dropped on document markings.LIMITE is for day-to-day internal papers which are often published later on. Examples are: a statement by Council chief Herman Van Rompuy before he makes it, draft EU summit conclusions or a draft EU policy before ministers rubber-stamp it.Any EU official or diplomat can read them, email them, print them or take them home and people frequently leak them to press.
It does not mean the leaks are benign - advance notice of an EU deal on, say, bank supervision could move markets or trigger lobbying designed to harm it. Meanwhile, non-EU diplomats who get their hands on internal EU papers use the Council's own guide to labelling to check if the documents are authentic.
The red line is RESTREINT - if you leak one, you might lose your job."I would never cross that line. I wouldn't even think about it. It needs to be properly declassified," one EU contact said.The Council last March spelled out what the higher labels mean and how to protect classified papers. It gave some more detail in a follow-up memo last May.It said RESTREINT material could be "disadvantageous to the interests of the European Union" if it comes out. It might "adversely affect" diplomatic relations, "distress" individuals or "facilitate" crime and "improper gain."CONFIDENTIEL information could "harm ... essential [EU] interests." It might prompt "formal protest or other sanctions" by non-EU countries. It might also "damage" EU "security or intelligence operations" and "undermine the financial viability of major organisations."
SECRET could "seriously harm" interests. It might "raise international tensions" or "threaten life" or "public order."TRES SECRET could cause "exceptionally grave prejudice" to EU wellbeing. A breach might cause "widespread loss of life," threaten "internal stability" or "cause severe long-term damage to the EU economy."
The rules on protecting documents indicate how sexy the contents might be.RESTREINT files are supposed to be sent on an encrypted system called Cortesy, which is cut off from the Internet.If you want to see CONFIDENTIEL, SECRET or TRES SECRET texts you have to be security-vetted by your home country's intelligence service.They check your police records, your medical history and your bank account for starters. If you drink too much, if you were part of a "subversive" group in your student days or if your relatives live in a country that might threaten them to get to you, chances are you will get a No.
CONFIDENTIEL and SECRET files are to be sent on a fancier encryption system called Solan. TOP SECRET papers are hand-delivered by a vetted courier in a sealed envelope marked only with the recipient's name.The high-level documents are kept in safes in rooms with electronic locks which log who goes in and out and which are watched by CCTV.Secure areas for reading them files are also "Tempest-protected" - insulated so that eavesdropping devices in neighbouring buildings cannot decode electro-magnetic radiation which comes off computer screens and wires.If you leak any of this stuff, you might go to jail.

'It's a subjective decision'

EUobserver spoke to several EU officials and former officials with access to SECRET or TRES-SECRET-level papers to learn more on what the labels mean in practice.It learned that EU officials are not quite sure.The author of a document decides which label to use and his head-of-unit or director-level superior checks it before it goes out. But even senior people can get it wrong."It's not because you just joined the service that you tend to overclassify or that after several years you underclassify because you think it's all business as usual. It's not an algorithm. You don't tick boxes. At the end of the day, it's a subjective decision which comes down to how used you are to handling sensitive information, how well you've been trained and how good your hierarchy is," one EU contact explained.He said people who underclassify tend to do it because they want a bigger readership for their work. People who overclassify do it to look important or just because they are twitchy by nature."I remember a British official who was so secretive that he used to hide his computer screen when colleagues walked by. But other British officials aren't like that," he added.Another EU contact noted that Austrian and French officials are known for overclassifying. "Sometimes I open a document and I think: 'What? You've put me to all this trouble of decrypting, registering, re-crypting and re-registering for this bullshit?'," he said.A third contact added: "I've seen two different versions of the same document, each with a different classification."A look at some (partly) declassified files gives an idea of the niceties of the craft.Four ex-RESTREINT files concern: a project to train justice officials in Georgia; plans for an EU police mission in Congo; a decision on an EU-Latin-America foundation; and an annual survey of civilian missions abroad.One ex-CONFIDENTIEL paper is about stopping a massacre in Uganda.There is a clear difference between RESTREINT and CONFIDENTIEL. The most sensitive RESTREINT item is a mandate for EU police in Congo to combat sexual violence. But the Uganda paper talks about France's "brigadier general Thonier" who is to deploy "1,000 armoured/mechanised troops" in two months' time to snatch control of an airport.The difference between RESTREINT and LIMITE is less obvious.The ex-RESTREINT Georgia paper records banalities, such as "sets of furniture have been delivered and assembled in the HQ and co-locations." Meanwhile, one ex-LIMITE paper from 2001 talks about prospects for EU intelligence sharing. Another LIMITE file lists the EU's beefs with Russia shortly after the Georgia-Russia war in 2008.EUobserver's contacts added a bit of flesh to the official terminology.They said RESTREINT files normally cover: operational plans for EU civilian/police missions; updates on security risks at the EU's foreign embassies; EU ambassadors' political reports; details of upcoming sanctions on small countries such as Belarus or Burma; reports on contacts with dissidents who visit the EU capital or in their home country.CONFIDENTIEL texts would be: plans for EU military missions; sanctions decisions on important countries such as China or Iran; reports containing EU officials and diplomats' personal judgements on third countries' VIPs; details of talks by EU diplomats in the Political and Security Committee; discussions in the Council's counter-terrorism group; some reports on terrorism and foreign crises by IntCen, the European External Action Service's (EEAS) intelligence-sharing office; the EU's negotiating position in bilateral trade talks.SECRET papers would include: information about EU or non-EU ministers or leaders which could be used against them; reports with names of foreign officials who leak sensitive information; the EU's negotiating position on a major international agreement designed to generate wealth for the Union; most IntCen reports; details of the "P5+1" anti-nuclear-proliferation talks with Iran; details of "Quartet" talks on the Middle East Peace Process.TRES SECRET documents could be: advance warning of a coup d'etat in a foreign country; the cryptographic keys to EU communications networks; information which exposes high-level intelligence sources."If [Russian foreign minister Sergei] Lavrov has a secret meeting with the Iranian foreign minister and they know that we know, then they know they have a mole, that we are plugged into a certain level of their decision-making," one EU contact said.
"Imagine the UK has the codes to read the diplomatic cables of another country. One blunder and that country changes its codes and you never get that access again," another EU source noted.Zooming out of the Council, the European Commission does things differently, creating extra scope for confusion.
The commission - which circulates commercially-valuable files - uses Council tags and said a "significant majority" of its sensitive documents are marked no higher than RESTREINT. But some departments have invented their own labels as well. Its anti-trust office, DG Comp, uses COMP OPERATIONS and COMP SPECIAL HANDLING.
The commission also uses different encryption systems, called NCN (New Communications System) and Rue (Restreint Union Europeene) to send documents.The EEAS uses NCN and Rue as well as Cortesy and Solan. It also uses Nato systems for contact with foreign delegations.

Saving face

Meanwhile, another motive for classification would make a pro-transparency activist grind his teeth.
One EU source said: "It may have happened that a document was classified because it made us look bad. But this is not something regular."Another EU contact said face-saving secrecy is normal.He gave the example that if Germany, for instance, was processing nuclear waste despite Chancellor Angela Merkel's commitments not to, the information would be marked up partly for security reasons (to prevent protests at the site) and partly to protect Merkel's reputation."If something is embarrassing, then it is a secret. This is what they call raison d'etat. If you don't like it - tough, grow up," he said.EU embarrassment is not always a bad thing, however.A RESTREINT report on Israeli settler violence leaked this year showed that EU ambassadors on the ground favour tougher action than EU ministers in the Council.EUobserver in 2010 saw a RESTREINT report about EU-Russia human rights talks. EU diplomats at the time said it was classified to protect victims' names. But the report also showed that EU officials think the talks amout to little, even though EU leaders say the opposite in public.When German journalist Hans-Martin Tillack in 2002 exposed fraud in the commission, its anti-fraud office, Olaf, had marked one relevant document and a second important paper as "CONFIDENTIAL." But the scandal helped to clean things up instead of harming "essential" EU interests.

Is that all?

The minute number of top-level texts in circulation also testifies to lack of trust between EU countries and institutions.Contacts estimated the Council sees between 600 to 1,000 new RESTREINT documents each year, 250 to 300 CONFIDENTIEL files and 30 to 100 SECRET ones.They said the number of TOP SECRET texts is between two and six.The figures come with a warning: the more sensitive the material, the more it is shared on a "need to know" basis. Some of EUobserver's contacts who were cleared to read TOP SECRET files had not seen a single one in over 10 years of work.One source joked that since Council chief Van Rompuy "isn't building a nuclear weapon, isn't fighting a war and doesn't run covert espionage programmes" the EU does not have hard information of its own.Another contact said EU countries which do all of these things do not see EU institutions as the right place to talk about them. "We [EU institutions] don't have secrets because member states basically don't trust us ... If Israel attacks Iran, the first time that we hear about it will be on CNN," he said.A third source recalled how hard it was to get EU countries to share even low-level intelligence in the early days of IntCen 10 years ago."Countries wouldn't share because they thought what they had was too good to share ... Spain would not send information on Colombia. Germany would not send information about its business activities in Kazakhstan," he said.He noted that the flow of information between EU capitals depends on human relationships as well as protocols."Who are these people [from Brussels]? Can I trust them? The world of intelligence, the world of secrets is very much like that. Who do you know? Who do you trust? ... It's all about people," he said.This article is the second one in a series of EUobserver investigative reports on EU information security. The next one - entitled "Multi-million-euro market for inside EU knowledge" - will look at lobbying and journalism in Brussels and will be published on 1 October

UNDERSTANDING WORLD GOVERNMENT
http://www.womensgroup.org/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=504526035342184251
BANK OF INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENT PRESS
http://www.bis.org/events/agm2009/pcvideo.htm
BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS PAPER 17 REGIONAL AREAS OF THE WORLD AND CURRENCIES
http://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap17.pdf
BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS SITE
http://www.bis.org/
G-10 PRESS RELEASES FROM BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS
http://www.bis.org/list/press_releases/said_12/index.htm
BIS ANNUAL REPORTS
http://www.bis.org/list/press_releases/said_10/index.htm
CENTRAL BANKERS SPEECHES
http://www.bis.org/list/cbspeeches/index.htm
BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS-NEW WORLD ORDER-JULY 10,10 HOURS 1 & 2
http://www.olivetreeviews.org/radio/mp3/

THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS IS THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE WORLD THAT LENDS ONLY TO CENTRAL BANKERS AROUND THE GLOBE.THE IMF LENDS TO THE COUNTRIES BANKS OF THE WORLD.BETWEEN THIS BANK AND THE IMF I BELIEVE WILL BE THE BANKS OF THE WORLD.THE IMF THE WORLD BANK AND THE POLICEMAN OF THE IMF THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS WHERE WE PAY OUT CAP & TRADE,CLIMATE,ENERGY SCAM TAXES TOO TO PAY FOR THE WORLD GOVERNMENT.THE GLOBAL CURRENCY WILL BE THE SDRS OR SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS UNTILL THE EU INVENTS THE WORLD MICROCHIP IMPLANT SYSTEM THEN THE EU WILL MAKE ALL TAKE THE IMPLANT OR BE MURDERED.

The truth about unlimited quantitative easing and what it means for Asia

Learn why the European Central Bank's so-called 'sterilization' comes with false advertising.Here's a view from David Carbon, analyst at DBS Group Research:As we go to press, the Fed deliberates on whether to introduce a third round of quantitative easing, or QE3. Markets have priced in a near certainty of this occurring and even were Fed to demur, only the expected due-date would change. Another chunk of change will likely be spent, if not this week, then next.Not to be outdone, the ECB has already announced a new bond buying plan of its own: the Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT) program. Under its auspices, the ECB will purchase bonds of struggling Eurozone economies in ‘unlimited quantities’. This is a new and important step – it’s the first time the ECB has thrown open its vaults to any and all comers and the ability to buy bonds in unlimited quantities means that speculators shorting those same bonds might want to reconsider or at least stand aside while the ECB train passes.In the event, the balance sheets of the world’s two largest central banks are about to expand again. How much bigger can they get? They’ve already doubled or tripled in size. Since Mar08, the Fed’s balance sheet has grown by 3.1x to USD 2900bn. The increment – $1900-odd billion – equates to 13% of GDP [1].The ECB’s balance sheet hasn’t grown quite that fast – it’s only expanded by 2.2x since Mar08. But the ECB’s was bigger to begin with. Back in Mar08 it was 15% of GDP; today it’s 32% of GDP, thanks to all kinds of emergency loans and bond purchases (LTRO, ELA, SMP) that can only be called quantitative easing too. In dollar terms, the ECB’s balance sheet has expanded by even more than the Fed’s: $2100bn vs $1900bn [2].If you add it all up, that’s 4 trillion dollars of balance sheet expansion from the Fed and the ECB. That’s a big number. Now grow it by QE3 in the US and an ‘unlimited quantity’ in Europe and you get, well, an even bigger number.Is all this money ever going to bring a US recovery? Is it going to end the European crisis? And what does another round of QE in the US and in Europe mean for Asia?In the US, our view is that QE3 won’t hurt. But it’s won’t help much either. The Fed has been pushing on a string for two years. Pushing on a longer string doesn’t change much.In Europe, the QE/OMT program has solid chance of doing a lot of good. This is the ‘big chunk of money’ that was always needed to ‘ringfence’ vulnerable assets and to keep speculators at bay. Keeping yields on sovereign bonds at manageable levels is critical to keeping debts from spiralling out of control.But OMT won’t solve the ‘real economy’ side of the problem. Competitiveness differentials lie at the heart of the debt crisis and OMT won’t eliminate them. On the contrary, keeping the euro intact practically guarantees that competitiveness differentials will persist. Slow growth and painfully high unemployment will remain for a long time, with or without the OMT. Thus, risks to the euro from this side of the equation remain as high as ever.What does another burst of QE/OMT mean for Asia? Will all that money come rushing over to Asia, pushing interest rates down and currencies, growth and equity markets up? Is Asia looking at 2010 all over again?
Probably not. First of all, one should recognize that most of the injections undertaken by both the Fed and the ECB never went into the real economy, the money stayed at the central banks in the form of reserves / deposits. The ECB calls this ‘sterilization’ and they note that whatever OMT money gets injected into the system will get mopped right back up again into central bank deposits.This is false advertising. Banks can withdraw these deposits any time they wish and put them wherever they want. If voluntarily leaving money at the central bank is ‘sterilization’, then the Fed’s QE program has been sterilized even more effectively than the ECB’s – 80% of the increment in the Fed’s balance sheet since Mar08 has been absorbed by increases in reserves / deposits. Only 52% of the ECB’s balance sheet growth has been absorbed this way.Still, the point remains that most of the QE undertaken on both sides of the pond isn’t entering the economy. And if it’s not entering the local economy, it can’t come ‘flooding over to Asia’ a day later.Does this mean Asia won’t see any inflows in 2013? Not at all. Inflows have been strong in recent years and they should rise modestly in 2013. But it’s not coming from QE at the Fed or the ECB. It’s coming from investors seeing growth and opportunity to profit from it in Asia. And it ebbs sharply when those investors see risks such as a break-up of the euro.To the extent that the ECB plan lowers the risk of a break-up – and it certainly does in the short-run – flows (and stronger growth) will come back to Asia. Not from QE per se but from the perception of lowered risk that QE brings. 
http://sbr.com.sg/economy/news/truth-about-unlimited-quantitative-easing-and-what-it-means-asia 

Unelected European “Green” Commissioner Says Markets Must be Governed

Jurriaan Maessen Infowars.com Sept 24, 2012
Unelected European commissioner for the environment calls for de-industrialization of the West and centralization of power to govern free markets

Speaking at a recent European summit on the future of plastics in the world economy, the European Commission’s “green” commissioner Janez Potočnik stated that markets can and must be governed by the European Commission if the earth’s resources are to keep up with global population growth.In a transcript of his speech on the EC’s website, marked “check before delivery”, Potočnik quoted his “good friend” Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme, as saying the idea of governing markets was agreed upon when Agenda 21 was formally created in 1992 at the original Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro:“Twenty years ago, we agreed what to do, now we have the tools to do it. If we do not go into the heart of economic policy, we will meet here at Rio+40 even more culpable. Markets are social constructs. They are not a force like gravity. They can be governed.”In these couple of sentences effect, the UNEP Secretary-General reveals several things. First, that current economic disparity offers “the tools” to roll out an agenda (21) which was already “agreed” upon in the early 1990s; second, that our dear Secretary-General wants to go “into the heart of economic policy”; and third, that from the onset of Agenda 21 the idea was to govern free markets.In response to the quote by his “good friend” at the UN, the European environmental commissioner piled some more absolutism onto this already formidable stack of proposals by stating:“Yes they can be governed and they must be governed. And for that we need also your help and your support. Your vision which goes beyond the short term interests and takes into account the unavoidable changes needed in our production and consumption patterns.”, the commissioner said.
We may not be wholly surprised that the European Commission’s communication department wants this particular speech checked before delivery to the press. The commissioner is after all quite upfront about the prospect of a de-industrialization campaign under the guidance of unelected commissions. His talk is littered with words as “governed”, “growth models”- not to mention “overpopulation.”O yes, the “green” commissioner starts out his speech by quoting population matters patron Jonathan Porritt, who wrote: “‘Human population growth and the per-capita consumption rate underlie all of the other present drivers for global change“. I know that Jonathan (Porritt) has long argued for attention to population and family planning in relation to sustainability, particularly as patron of the “Population Matters” charity. But this was quite an astounding statement… I repeat; it would “underlie all of the other present drivers for global change.”, Potočnik said.The rest of Potočnik’s speech was related to the issue at hand, namely the future of plastics and what to do about all those consumers, especially in the West.“I’m afraid that one cannot govern the world of the 21st Century without taking into account the longer term picture and consequences. It would be simply self-destructive. We need industry and investors on board. Rather than fighting the power of capital, or trying to legislate away its environmental downsides, we need to harness market forces to turn economies onto a track that is sustainable economically, financially, socially and environmentally. We need green economics… also in the plastic industry.”The commissioner also stressed that for him “this is the new industrial policy. We must recognize that our future competitiveness will depend increasingly – perhaps overwhelmingly – on our ability to do more with less.”More with less. Agenda 21 in a nutshell. More carbon taxes, less freedom. Or: more resources, less people. It’s important to point your attention to the pre-planned nature of this agenda unfolding, and the population-aspect dominating this agenda. A 1991 policy paper prepared for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) outlines a strategy for the transfer of wealth in name of the environment to be implemented in the course of 35 to 40 years. As it turns out, it is a visionary paper describing phase by phase the road to world dictatorship under Agenda 21. As the author Ignacy Sachs states in the policy paper:
“To be meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades. Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought about by the lengthening of the time-span.”
In his paper The Next 40 Years: Transition Strategies to the Virtuous Green Path: North/South/East/Global, Sachs accurately describes not only the intended time-span to bring about a global society, but also what steps should be taken to ensure “population stabilization”:“In order to stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics, mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved fairly inefficient.”In the first part of the (in retrospect) bizarrely accurate description of current events as they unfold, Sachs points out redistribution of wealth is the only viable path towards population stabilization and- as he calls it- a “virtuous green world”. Sachs:“The way out from the double bind of poverty and environmental disruption calls for a fairly long period of more economic growth to sustain the transition strategies towards the virtuous green path of what has been called in Stockholm ecodevelopement and has since changed its name in Anglo-Saxon countries to sustainable development.”“(…) a fair degree of agreement seems to exist, therefore, about the ideal development path to be followed so long as we do not manage to stabilize the world population and, at the same time, sharply reduce the inequalities prevailing today.”, the professor states.“The bolder the steps taken in the near future”, Sachs asserts, “the shorter will be the time span that separates us from a steady state. Radical solutions must address to the roots of the problem and not to its symptoms. Theoretically, the transition could be made shorter by measures of redistribution of assets and income.”

Sachs points to the political difficulties of such proposals being implemented (because free humanity tends to distrust any national government let alone transnational government to redistribute its well-earned wealth). He therefore proposes these measures to be implemented gradually, following a meticulously planned strategy:
“The pragmatic prospect is one of transition extending itself over several decades.”In the second sub-chapter “The Five Dimensions of Ecodevelopment”, professor Sachs sums up the main dimensions of this carefully outlined move to make Agenda 21 a very real future prospect. The first dimension he touches upon is “Social Sustainability”:“The aim is to build a civilization of being within greater equity in asset and income distribution, so as to improve substantially the entitlements of the broad masses of population and of reduce the gap in standards of living between the have and the have nots.”This of course means, reducing the standards of living in “The North” (U.S., Europe) and upgrading those of the developing nations (“The South and The East”). This would have to be realized through what Sachs calls “Economic Sustainability”: “made possible by a more efficient allocation and management of resources and a steady flow of public and private investment.”The third dimension described by the professor is “Ecological Sustainability” which, among other things, limits “the consumption of fossile fuels and other easily depletable or environmentally harmful products, substituting them by renewable and/or plentiful and environmentally friendly resources, reducing the volume of pollutants by means of energy and resource conservation and recycling and, last but not least, promoting self-constraint in material consumption on part of the rich countries and of the privileged social strata all over the world.”To make this happen Sachs stresses the need of “defining the rules for adequate environmental protection, designing the institutional machinery and choosing the mix of economic, legal and administrative instruments necessary for the implementation of environmental policies.”In order to realize such a dramatic new direction for the world, Sachs once again stresses the importance of incremental implementation. A matter of boiling the frog slowly as opposed to throwing the poor animal into a boiling-hot cooking pan:“Even if we know where we want to get, the operational question is how do we proceed to put humankind on the virtuous path of genuine development, socially responsible and in harmony with nature. It is submitted that UNCED 92 should give considerable attention to the formulation of transition strategies that could become the central piece of the Agenda 21.”

This is the word- Agenda 21: the UN strategy for redistributing the wealth accumulated by the “North” in order to create a completely “balanced” world society- under auspices of the United Nations of course and the private central banks controlling it. This can only come about by destroying the middle-class. A sudden redistribution and industrialization would not do- for the middle-class would undoubtedly rise in defiance against it. Therefore, Sachs argues for an incremental and carefully planned dissolution of the middle-class phase by phase:“To be meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades. Thirty-five to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give enough time to the postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought about by the lengthening of the time-span. The retooling of industries, even in periods of rapid growth, requires ten to twenty years. The restructuration and the expansion of the infrastructures requires several decades and this is a crucially important sector from the point of view of environment.”Then Sachs plunges into his most revealing statement:“However, the single most important reason to consider the transition strategies over a minimum of thirty-five to forty years stems from the non-linearity of these strategies; they should be devised as a succession of changing priorities over time. A good illustration is provided by the population transition. In order to stabilize the populations of the South by means other than wars or epidemics, mere campaigning for birth control and distributing of contraceptives has proved fairly inefficient.”Sachs argues that “an accelerated programme of social and economic development of the rural areas should be the outmost priority in the first phase of a realistic population stabilization scheme.”Who or what is to coordinate all this, according to Sachs, and how exactly is the UN to take control?“The solutions”, says Sachs, “can vary in terms of their boldness and take the form of global, multilateral or bilateral arrangements.” These arrangements should as far as Sachs is concerned ensure “at least partially the automacity of financial transfers by some form of fiscal mechanisms, be it a small income tax or an array of indirect taxes on goods and services whose production and consumption has significant environmental impacts.”Over time, so proposes Sachs, these taxes should increase:“Starting the operation with a one per ten thousand tax and increasing it so as to reach one per thousand in ten to twenty years seems a fairly realistic proposal, the more so that the scheme creates an interesting market for the private enterprises involved in R and D.”Reading all this, the question as to what entity should take charge is not difficult to answer. Sachs:“In order to generate maximum synergies between the national strategies and global action, the United Nations should create a forum for the periodical discussion and evaluation of these strategies and a research, monitoring and flexible planning facility to put them in a global perspective.(…). The forum should have a fair representation of all the main actors involved: governments, parliaments, citizen movements and the business world. Given its importance, it should be lifted from specialized agencies to a central place in the UN system.”This almost literally echoes the recent call by a group of scientists for the upcoming UN Earth Summit to create “a Sustainable Development Council within the UN system to integrate social, economic and environmental policy at the global level.”The underlying, more sinister element of Agenda 21 is of course the concerted effort on the part of the professors and unelected commiczars of this world, through multilateral treaties and regulations, to not only control the populations of the world but to cull them.Jurriaan Maessen is the writer and editor at http://explosivereports.com/

Greece should get more time, France says

Today @ 09:30 SEPT 24,12 By Valentina Pop

BRUSSELS - France is in favour of giving Greece more time to meet bailout conditions, provided it is "sincere" on implementing reforms, French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault has said."We can already give it more time to pull through," he said in an interview with the Mediapart website on Sunday (23 September). He added that a Greek exit from the eurozone "cannot be the solution."But he also said Athens should be "sincere in implementing reforms, including fiscal ones."The Greek coalition government, led by centre-right leader Antonis Samaras, has still not managed to agree the €11.5 billion worth of spending cuts that were due at the end of June, with the junior coalition partners resisting further pension and wage cuts.
Ayrault said he had talked to the leader of the Social Democrats (Pasok), Evangelos Venizelos, about the country's attempts to overcome what is now a three-year long financial disaster."Those who have a lot of money in Greece invest in housing abroad. It's all immoral. The Greek crisis is structural, but also political," Ayrault noted.Two rounds of Greek elections in spring as well as political squabbles have helped to create a funding gap of at least €20 billion, on top of the promised €11.5 billion in spending cuts, Der Spiegel magazine has reported.The so-called troika of international lenders (European Commission, European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund) will only approve the disbursement of the next €31 billion tranche if the €20 billion gap is filled.On Friday, the troika suspended its mission and said it will come back to Athens in a week's time."During this period some mission experts will remain in Athens to assist the authorities with further technical work, while contacts will continue with the authorities from respective headquarters," the commission said in a statement.It gave reassurances that the "brief pause" did not signal any trouble and that discussions since early September had been "productive."The delay could be politically motivated to allow the US presidential elections on 6 November to take place without bad news from Greece that could send shockwaves through international markets.

Greece is not alone

Meanwhile, speculation about Greece's eurozone future continues.Swiss banking giant UBS has estimated a "likelihood of over 50 percent" that Greece will leave the eurozone next year. And it does not rule out that other euro countries may follow.Portugal last week ran into trouble over a contested austerity measure linked to its €78 billion bailout when 1 million people took to the streets and the government coalition almost collapsed over the issue.The government has since indicated it may repeal the measure, but it will need to come up with something similar in order for the troika to approve its next tranche of bailout money.
Spain is reportedly negotiating a second bailout after having already secured €100 billion in June for its banking sector. Financial Times Deutschland on Monday wrote of an "XXL package" to be agreed in November including a second bailout for Spain, more time for Greece and a fresh bailout for Cyprus.
Separately, Der Spiegel quoted unnamed officials saying there are plans to increase the eurozone's €500bn bailout fund (ESM) to €2 trillion.The way to do it, according to the German magazine, would be to repeat the failed experiment with the temporary bailout fund (EFSF) of finding investors in China and elsewhere who would put money into a "special purpose vehicle."The plan is supposed to work this time because the ESM - due to come into force on 8 October - will be a permanent fund and have a larger firepower than its predecessor.

Friday, September 21, 2012

SIGNS TURN INTO OUT RIGHT JUDGEMENT

KING JESUS IS COMING FOR US ANY TIME NOW. THE RAPTURE. BE PREPARED TO GO.

WHATS MY TAKE ON THE SIGNS-JUDGEMENTS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION AND THE REST OF THE SCRIPTURES.

I BELIEVE THE SIGNS ARE FROM ALL THE SCRIPTURES (BIBLE)-INCLUDING REVELATION.BUT I CLASSIFY THEM AS 2 CATEGORIES. 1-SIGNS,2-JUDGEMENTS.

THE EARTH (WORLD) NEVER ENDS (AS WORLD ENDERS CLAIM)(THE END OF THE AGE OF GRACE ONLY)(DECIEVERS CLAIME THE END OF THE WORLD-NOT ME)

ECCLESIASTES 1:4
4  One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.(AND EVER)(WORLD NEVER ENDS)(END OF THE AGE OF GRACE ONLY,NOT THE END OF THE WORLD)

PSALMS 104:5
5  Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.(NO END OF THE WORLDERS NONESENSE HERE)

MATTHEW 5:5
5  Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.(FOREVER,NOT HEAVEN)

PSALMS 37:29
29  The righteous shall inherit the land,(ON EARTH) and dwell therein for ever.

ISAIAH 45:17
17  But Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation:(FOREVER) ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded world without end.(JERUSALEM ISRAEL ON EARTH FOREVER-NEVER ENDING)

EPHESIANS 3:21
21  Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.

I BELIEVE THE BEGINNING OF THE SIGNS OCCURR SO CHRISTIANS KNOW THAT THE RAPTURE CAN OCCURR AT ANY MOMENT.THE SIGNS MEANT NOTHING UNTIL ISRAEL BECAME A NATION AND RECAPTURED JERUSALEM.ONCE THESE PROPHECIES WERE FULFILLED THAT WOULD BE THE LAST GENERATION TO SEE ALL THE SIGNS,THEN THE RAPTURE,THEN BACK TO EARTH WITH JESUS AFTER THE JUDGEMENTS OF THE TRIBULATION PERIOD OR 7 YEAR PEACE TREATY OF DANIEL 9:27.OK SO THE BIBLE SAYS WHEN ALL THE PROPHECIES OF THE WHOLE BIBLE ARE IN THEIR BEGGINING STAGES,NOT FULL OUT STAGES.LOOK UP FOR THE RAPTURE TO OCCURR AT ANY SECOND.THATS WERE WE ARE AT NOW I BELIEVE.WE CAN TELL BY THE BIBLE PROPHECIES ALL COMING TO PASS IN THEIR BEGINNING STAGES NOW THAT THE RAPTURE CAN HAPPEN ANY SECOND NOW.

MATTHEW 24:33-36
33  So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things,(ALL THE SIGNS OF PROPHECY HAPPENING IN THEIR BEGGINING STAGES AFTER ISRAEL BECOMES A NATION AND IN CONTROL OF JERUSALEM)(THEN) know that it is near, even at the doors.(THE RAPTURE)
34  Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,(1967-ISRAELS RECAPTURE OF JERUSALEM=40-51 YRS(A GENERATION)=2007-2018) till all these things be fulfilled.(ALL THE LITERAL PROPHECIES OF THE BIBLE WILL BE FULFILLED(AT LEAST 500 WILL BE FULFILLED)
35  Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
36  But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

DANIEL 9:24
24  Seventy weeks(490 YEARS) are determined upon thy people (ISRAEL) and upon thy holy city,(JERUSALEM) to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.(JESUS AS RULING KING FROM JERUSALEM FOREVER)

OK SO WE ARE WAITING FOR THE RAPTURE TO OCCURR IN THIS LAST GENERATION. THEN AFTER THE RAPTURE OCCURRS.THE SIGNS TURN INTO THEIR FINAL STAGES AND BECOME JUDGEMENTS ON THE WHOLE WORLD.NOT THAT THEY WEREN'T JUDGEMENTS AS SIGNS,THEY WERE-BUT NOW THE COMPLETE JUDGEMENT IS POURED UPON THE EARTH IN THEIR FINAL FULFILLMENT.AFTER THE RAPTURE JESUS OPENS THE FULL SIGNS OF JUDGEMENTS ON THE EARTH TO BE FULFILLED.AS SEALS,TRUMPETS AND BOWLS.

LUKE 21:28,36
28 And when these things begin to come to pass,(ALL THE SIGNS OF PROPHECY HAPPENING-BEGGINING TO ALL BE FULFILLED) then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.(THE RAPTURE)
36 Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass,(LITERALLY ON THE EARTH) and to stand before the Son of man.(RAPTURE-INVESTIGATION OF OUR CHRISTIAN LIVES AT THE RAPTURE-AND THE CROWNS GIVEN TO JESUS BY US FOR OUR CHRISTIAN WORKS HE DONE THROUGH US)

REVELATION 4:1-2
1 After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter.
2 And immediately I was in the spirit: and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne.

REVELATION 5:1-
1 And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals.
2 And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof?
3 And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon.
4 And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon.
5 And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.(JESUS OPENS THE JUDGEMENTS TO COME ON THE EARTH IN THEIR FINAL STAGES,OR THE SIGNS)
6 And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth.
7 And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne.
8 And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.
9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book,(JESUS) and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.(FOREVER-NEVER ENDING)
11 And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne and the beasts and the elders: and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands;(MILLIONS)
12 Saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing.
13 And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne,(KING JESUS-JESUS GETS OUR CROWNS WE HAVE ACUMULALED) and unto the Lamb for ever and ever.
14 And the four beasts said, Amen. And the four and twenty elders fell down and worshipped him that liveth for ever and ever.

SO AS WE CHRISTIANS GET RAPTURED TO HEAVEN AND ARE BEING INVESTIGATED OR JUDGED FOR OUR LIFE AS CHRISTIANS.SINCE ALL HAS TO APPEAR BEFORE JESUS TO GIVE ACCOUNT OF OUR LIVES.AND OUR CROWNS WE HAVE ACCUMULATED ARE GIVEN TO JESUS.THIS WILL TAKE YEARS TO INVESTIGATE EVERY CHRISTIANS LIFE IN FRONT OF JESUS.THIS BLEEP UP,BLEEP DOWN RAPTURE THEORY AT THE END OF THE 7 YEAR TRIBULATION IS COMPLETE NONSENSE.IT WILL TAKE YEARS FOR ALL THE CHRISTIANS TO BE INVESTIGATED IN FRONT OF JESUS.BUT WHEN THIS IS GOING ON JESUS ALSO UNLEASHES THE 21 JUDGEMENTS ON THE EARTH AS THEY ARE GETTING JUDGED FOR HATING GOD(JESUS) AND ISRAEL.SO WHILE WERE IN HEAVEN WATCHING EVERYTHING HAPPENING ON EARTH.ON EARTH THE FINAL FULFILLMENTS OF THE SIGNS HAVE TURNED ITO OUT RIGHT JUDGEMENTS SO ALL THE PROPHECIES CAN BE FULFILLED IN THE LAST 7 YEARS OF THE PEACE TREATY OR 7 YEAR TRIBULATION PERIOD.

AND THATS MY TAKE WHY I CALL THE SIGNS-SIGNS,THEN OUT RIGHT COMPLETE JUDGEMENTS ON THE WHOLE WORLD.I HOPE THIS MAKES SENSE TO PEOPLE.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

JESUS' CLOTHES DIVIDED-TODAY JERUSALEM DIVIDED

WE FIND IN JESUS LIFE THAT HIS STUFF WAS DIVIDED.SO JESUS AND ISRAEL HAVE ANOTHER CONNECTION.JESUS' CLOTHING WAS DIVIDED AND BBET ON TO GET.AND TODAY THE PALESTINIANS(SO CALLED) WANT TO DIVIDED AND PART JERUSALEM FROM ISRAEL.SO HERE WE SEE JESUS AND ISRAEL COMPARISONS AGAIN.AND ON THE 3RD DAY JESUS CAME TO LIFE AND IN THE 3RD MILLENIUM AFTER 2,000 YEARS-ISRAEL WAS REBORN MAY 14,1948.AND IT WAS THE 3RD HOUR WHEN THEY CRUCIFIED JESUS ALSO.

PSALMS 22:18
18  They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.

MATTHEW 27:35
35  And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots.

MARK 15:24
24  And when they had crucified him, they parted his garments, casting lots upon them, what every man should take.
25  And it was the third hour, and they crucified him.

LUKE 23:34
34  Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.

JOHN 19:24
24  They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did.

AFTER 2,000 OF JESUS DEATH ISRAEL BECAME A NATION

HOW WE KNOW A 1,000 YEARS IS ONE DAY.AFTER CREATION-GOD CREATED THE WORLD IN 7 DAYS.SO ON THE 3RD DAY (2,000 YEARS AFTER JESUS DIED,ISRAEL BECAME A NATION AND RECAPTURED JERUSALEM THIS IS THE COUNTDOWN OF THE LAST GENERATION ON EARTH)

HOSEA 6:2
2  After two days will he revive us:(ISRAEL AS A NATION(1948) AND RECAPTURE JERUSALEM(1967) in the third day he will raise us up,(ANY TIME AFTER 2007-1967+40-51 YEARS FOR A GENERATION=2007-2018 SHOULD BE THE END OF THE LAST GENERATION OR LAST AGE OF GRACE)(NOT THE END OF THE WORLD,THE WORLD GOES ON FOREVER AND EVER) and we shall live in his sight.(JESUS LIVES FOREVER WITH ISRAEL RULING FROM JERUSALEM FOREVER)

PSALMS 90:4
4  For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.

2 PETER 3:8
8  But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

MATTHEW 24:33-36
33  So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things,(ALL THE SIGNS OF PROPHECY HAPPENING IN THEIR BEGGINING STAGES AFTER ISRAEL BECOMES A NATION AND IN CONTROL OF JERUSALEM)(THEN) know that it is near, even at the doors.(THE RAPTURE)
34  Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,(1967-ISRAELS RECAPTURE OF JERUSALEM=40-51 YRS(A GENERATION)=2007-2018) till all these things be fulfilled.(ALL THE LITERAL PROPHECIES OF THE BIBLE WILL BE FULFILLED(AT LEAST 500 WILL BE FULFILLED)
35  Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
36  But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

DANIEL 9:24
24  Seventy weeks(490 YEARS) are determined upon thy people (ISRAEL) and upon thy holy city,(JERUSALEM) to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.(JESUS AS RULING KING FROM JERUSALEM FOREVER)

EZEKIEL 36:24
24 For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land.

MATTHEW 24:32
32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:(ISRAEL WAS LITERALLY REBORN JUST BEFORE SUMMER,MAY 14,1948).

LUKE 21:24
24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.(ISRAEL RECAPTURES JERUSALEM)(THE BEGGINING OF THE LAST GENERATION AND THE LAST END OF THE AGE OF GRACE.NOT THE END OF THE WORLD ,THE WORLD GOES ON FOREVER)

ISRAEL-JERUSALEM DIVIDED

ZECHARIAH 12:1-5 King James Bible
1 The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.
2 Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem.
3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.
4 In that day, saith the LORD, I will smite every horse with astonishment, and his rider with madness: and I will open mine eyes upon the house of Judah, and will smite every horse of the people with blindness.
5 And the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, The inhabitants of Jerusalem shall be my strength in the LORD of hosts their God.

JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people (ISRAEL) and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(JERUSALEM)(WW3 STARTS BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AND ISRAELIS UPROOTED FROM THEIR GOD GIVIN LAND BRINGS 3 DEAD BILLION IN WW3)

ZECHARIAH 14:12-13
12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet,(ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT) and their eyes shall consume away in their holes,(ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT) and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.(ATOMIC BOMB EFFECT)
13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour.(1/2-3 BILLION DIE IN WW3)

ZECHARIAH 14:1-2 King James Bible
1 Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.
2 For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

MOONS AND STOCK MARKET CRASHES

ROSH-HASHANA HAS BEEN POSTPONED TODAY WILL BE STARTED TOMORROW SEPTEMBER 17,2012 IN ISRAEL AND 11AM EST  SEPT 17,12 IN CANADA.

JEWISH HOLIDAYS REMAING IN 2012 +
http://www.chabad.org/calendar/holidays_cdo/aid/1126695/jewish/2012-Holidays.htm
http://www.chabad.org/calendar/holidays_cdo/aid/1127085/jewish/2013-Holidays.htm
http://www.chabad.org/calendar/holidays_cdo/aid/1127364/jewish/2014-Holidays.htm

TORAH PORTION FROM SEPT 16 - 22,12
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2011/09/parshah-vayelech-deuteronomy-311-3130.html

ROSH-HASHANA STARTS IN ISRAEL TONIGHT AT 6PM,-11 AM EST IN CANADA ON SEPT 16,12.HAPPY NEW YEAR ISRAEL,WE PRAY FOR THE PEACE OF JERUSALEM HERE IN CANADA.AND SHALOM IN EVERYTHING ISRAELIS.FOR THE NEXT MONTH LOOKOUT WORLD.THE HOLIDAYS ARE ON IN ISRAEL.AND IF THERE WOULD POSSIBLY BE A STOCK MARKET CRASH WITH A BUBBLE ATTACHED TO IT-THE TIMELINE WOULD BE A TOP BY THE NEW MOON ON OCTOBER 13,12 AND BE MANIC THEN TILL NOVEMBER 13,2012 THE SOLAR ECLIPSE.THEN THE MARKET SHOULD RALLY FROM NOVEMBER 13,12 TO NOVEMBER 28,12 THE LUNAR ECLIPSE.THEN THE KEY PHASE IS AFTER THE NOVEMBER 29,12 LUNAR ECLIPSE.THE FIRST HALF OF DECEMBER WOULD BE THE PRIME TIME FOR THE CRASH.

AND THEN THE NEXT POSSIBLE TIME FOR A CRASH COULD BE MARCH OR APRIL 2013.LUNAR ECLIPSE APRIL 25 TO MAY 10 SOLAR ECLIPSE IS THE BEST TIME FOR A POSSIBLE CRASH.AS ITS IN A 2.1 YEAR CYCLE ALSO AND A 6.37 YEAR CYCLE. 

SOLAR ECLIPSE CALENDAR
http://www.moongiant.com/Solar_Eclipse_Calendar.php 
LUNAR ECLIPSE CALENDAR
http://www.moongiant.com/Lunar_Eclipse_Calendar.php 
FULL MOON CALENDAR
http://www.farmersalmanac.com/full-moon-dates-and-times/

THE MARKET TENDS TO RISE AHEAD OF A FULL MOON.
THE MARKET TENDS TO FALL AFTER A FULL MOON. 

A FINANCIAL BUBBLE WITH A NEXT ECLISPSE SEEMS TO TRIGGER A CRASH.

THE STOCK MARKET GENERALLY TOPS ON A NEW MOON ONE MONTH BEFORE  THE SOLAR ECLIPSE.OR OCCASIONALLY 2 NEW MOONS BEFORE THE SOLAR ECLIPSE. 

THE MAIN PATTERN IS 1 FULL MOON BEFORE THE SOLAR ECLIPSE.THEN THE MARKET DECLINES UNTIL THE SOLAR ECLIPSE,THEN IT WILL RISE FOR 2 WEEKS.2 WEEKS AFTER THE SOLAR ECLIPSE THERE IS USUALLY A LUNAR ECLIPSE.AT THE TIME OF THE LUNAR ECLIPSE THAT IS WHEN THE MARKET WILL DECLINE OR COLLAPSE FOR 2 OR 3 WEEKS.THEN THE NEXT BOTTOM IS USUALLY AT THE NEXT FULL MOON.

THE SOLAR ECLIPSE AND LUNAR ECLIPSE COME IN PAIRS.SOMETIMES THEY REVERSE.BUT THE BEST CRASH COMBINATION IS WHEN THE LUNAR ECLIPSE IS LAST. 

Thursday September 13, 2012-Guests: Steve Puetz & Aaron Brickman-Topic: Mysterious correlation between cosmic events and market crashes http://www.trunews.com/listen_now.htm
www.thescientificworldview.blogspot.com

RELATED STEVE PUETZ
http://thescientificworldview.blogspot.ca/2010/04/meet-steve-puetz.html
http://www.uct-news.com/
http://www.uct-news.com/page2.html
http://www.uct-news.com/page11.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7ZceLA6dWw&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNLzeaiJ_tI&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXAeap0a1MI&feature=relmfu
http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Abstracts&tab1=Display&id=5227
http://conf17.worldnpa.org/

SEE WHAT DISASTER HITS SOMEWHERE IN THE WORLD.THE FEASTS AND FASTS AND HOLIDAYS IN ISRAEL WILL BE DAYS PROPHECIES WILL BE FULFILLED ON.

SIGNS OF THE END OF THE AGE (NOT THE WORLD) THE WORLD GOES ON FOREVER.

GENESIS 1:5,14
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:(ISRAELS HOLY DAYS AND SABBATH STARTS AT 6PM) And for SIGNS (PROPHECY SIGNS TO HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE, OUR DAY)

ROSH HASHANA POSTPONED TILL TOMORROW

The Purpose of the Hebrew Calendar Rosh HaShanah Dehiyyot (Postponements of the First Day of Tishrei)

Bookmark or cite this page as <http://www.sym454.org/hebrew/postpone.htm>
by Dr. Irv Bromberg, University of Toronto, Canada email icon
[Click here to go back to the Hebrew Calendar Studies home page]

Menu of Topics:

  1. Introduction to the Rosh HaShanah Postponement Rules
  2. Molad Zakein
  3. Lo ADU Rosh
  4. Third Rule
  5. Fourth Rule
  6. Frequencies of Rosh HaShanah Postponements and Weekdays
  7. The Visibility of the New Lunar Crescent on Rosh HaShanah
  8. The Net Effect of the Rosh HaShanah Postponements
  9. Summary

Introduction to the Rosh HaShanah Postponement Rules

As shown in this chart of the Traditional Hebrew Calendar Rosh HaShanah status 96 KB, relative to the Hebrew weekday of the molad of Tishrei, in about 39% of years Rosh HaShanah is not postponed, in about 47% of years it is postponed by one day, and in the remaining approximately 14% of years Rosh HaShanah is postponed by two days.
Traditionally the moment of the molad is expressed in terms of the number of hours since sunset, which I call "Talmudic Temporal Time". This method has the advantage that the Hebrew weekday is directly and easily determined by calculating the number of days elapsed since the epoch of the Hebrew Calendar + 1 (because that In comparing actual lunar conjunctions to the moments of the traditional molad, where the moladRosh HaShanah was on Yom Sheini = Monday), then divide by 7, and add 1 day to the remainder, which is the Hebrew day number of the week.
To compare molad moments to actual lunar conjunctions for astronomical evaluations, however, it is necessary to subtract 6 hours from the traditional molad moment so that it is expressed in terms of the civil time (but then the weekday will be wrong for all molad moments between sunset and midnight).
The Rosh HaShanah postponement rules are an innovation of the fixed arithmetic Traditional Hebrew calendar. They did not apply to the original observational lunar crescent calendar. Instead, the observational calendar varied the month lengths to be 29 days if the new lunar crescent was seen at sunset at the end of the 29th day, or 30 days otherwise. On the other hand, the Talmud Bavli mentions in tractate Rosh HaShanah page 20A that the Court (Sanhedrin calendar committee) used to intimidate visible crescent witnesses to withdraw or confuse their testimony or to disqualify them if otherwise Rosh HaShanah would be sanctified on Wednesday or Friday (see rule #1, below). Likewise, the Chinese calendar, based on astronomical algorithms for the longitudes of Sun and Moon, varies the length of months from 29 to 30 days depending on the computed moment of the actual lunar conjunctions. The Traditional Hebrew Calendar has constant month lengths, but something has to vary to accomodate the non-integral mean length of the molad (representing the mean lunar cycle), which equals 29 days 12 hours 44 minutes 1 part (each "part" equals 3+1/3 seconds = 1/18 of a minute), and this is accomplished by adjusting the lengths of the two months after the previous month of Tishrei, that is Cheshvan and Kislev, according to the following four rules:

1. Molad Zakein: If the molad of Tishrei falls on or after noon then postpone Rosh HaShanah to the next day.

This is the second-most-commonly invoked postponement rule, but logically should be checked first because its invokation can cause Rosh HaShanah to be postponed to a disallowed weekday (which in turn will be handled by the second postponement rule). The Hebrew term molad zakein literally means "old molad".
For example, this is the reason for postponing from Monday to Tuesday in Hebrew year 5786.
Note that noon coincides with 3/4 of the day elapsed, because Hebrew calendar days start at sunset. Therefore, rather than explicitly checking the timing of the molad moment, German Mathematician Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss (Gauß) pointed out that this postponement rule could be bypassed simply by adding 1/4 day to the moment. If the original moment had been past noon then adding that 1/4 day would automatically advance the molad moment to the following day.
Traditionally, this postponement was considered necessary to ensure the visibility of the New Moon on the first day of Rosh HaShannah. In reality, it doesn't ensure that, see below for my astronomical analysis of the visibility of the lunar crescent on Rosh HaShanah. Remy Landau states that this postponement is to ensure that the calculated time of any molad does not exceed the first day of any month in the Hebrew calendar, see <http://hebrewcalendar.tripod.com/#11>.
The Talmud Bavli, in tractate Rosh HaShanah page 20B explains that if the molad occurs after noon then there is no way that the new lunar crescent will be visible at the coming sunset (six hours later), but it will be visible at the following sunset. This noon cutoff time led Rabbi Zerachiah ben Isaac Ha-Levi Gerondi (the Baal HaMaor, 1125-1186 AD) to assign the meridian 90° east of Jerusalem as the "date line" in Jewish Law, but this was partially based on the incorrect assumption that the traditional molad moment refers to the meridian of Jerusalem. As I have shown on my web page "The Molad of the Hebrew Calendar" at <http://www.sym454.org/hebrew/molad.htm>, the original historical reference meridian of longitude of the traditional molad was actually midway between the Nile River and the end of the Euphrates River, which, according to the logic of the Baal HaMaor, would shift the "date line" to about 94° east of Jerusalem, or almost 130° east of Greenwich, passing east of Korea, through the middle of the southern island of Japan, the Philippine Sea, the Java Sea west of New Guinea, the Timor Sea north of Australia, and just west of Darwin, Australia. Another problem with the interpretation of the Baal HaMaor is that although in his own era the world was understood to be a sphere with times of day differing between meridians of longitude, in the era of the sages of the Talmud it was thought that the world was flat, during the night Sun was "outside" the celestial sphere, and during rising or setting Sun moved through "windows" (or tunnels) between the outside and inside of the celestial sphere such that sunrise and sunset occurred at the same moment for the entire world. These concepts are discussed as such in that section of the Talmud and by its commentators. In those days there was no understanding of time zones or meridians of longitude, therefore the noon cutoff time specified in the Talmud could not have had any relationship to any concept of a "date line".
The Baal HaMaor also claimed that the selected cutoff time ensures that "somewhere in the world" the actual lunar conjunction will correspond to the traditional molad moment. However, there is nothing special about that particular cutoff time that ensures any higher probability of that statement being true, in fact it would be equally true for any alternative cutoff time. Even so, of what relevance is it?
Furthermore, the reference meridian for the traditional moladot is drifting eastward at an accelerating rate, so are we to learn that the International Date Line is also drifting eastward at the same rate, to remain 90° (6 hours) ahead of it?
If the "date line" were to pass through populated lands then it would be possible to almost completely avoid Shabbat by taking a step to the east across the line as Shabbat starts west of the line, waiting for Shabbat to end west of the line, then taking a step back to the west across the line as Shabbat starts east of the line. Conversely one could observe two consecutive days of Shabbat by staying to the west of the date line at the start of Shabbat, then as Shabbat is ending west of the line taking a step east across the line where it will be near the start of Shabbat. Such examples make it obvious that the international date line must never pass through populated lands, and led Rabbi Avrohom Yeshaya Karelitz (the Chazon Ish) in 1941 AD to extend the halachah date line to the eastern coasts of Asia and of Australia. Nevertheless that extension still leaves the problem that a person swimming at a coastal beach, or boating in that region, will be crossing the line. Perhaps such a date line should be extended to the continental shelf?
For more information about the date line controversy see Willie Roth's essay at <http://koltorah.org/old/ravj/The International Date Line and Halacha.htm>, and "The Sabbath, the International Date Line and Jewish Law" by Rabbi Yehuda Shurpin at <http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/print/true/aid/1736567/jewish/The-Sabbath-the-International-Date-Line-and-Jewish-Law.htm> (cancel the print command if you wish).
There is some commentary debate as to whether the cited Talmud text refers to the actual lunar conjunction or the mean conjunction as estimated by the Hebrew Calendar molad arithmetic. In the era of Hillel ben Yehudah the molad of Tishrei was on average 4+1/5 hours late with respect to the actual mean lunar conjunctions but today it is on average 6 hours late, as shown in this chart 316KB (see also the last paragraph on this page), although today an individual molad moment can be as much as 16 hours late and in the era of the Talmud a molad moment could have been almost 14+1/2 hours late. Astronomically, in the era of the Talmud the absolute minimum elapsed time from the actual lunar conjunction (New Moon) until the moment when the visible crescent for the month of Tishrei could be visible at sunset in Jerusalem under rare ideal conditions was about 3/4 day. In other words, when the actual lunar conjunction of Tishrei occurs shortly after midnight in Jerusalem, the new lunar crescent might be seen at sunset that same day. Such an early crescent would be truly exceptional (<2 2="2" a="a" altitude="altitude" and="and" at="at" between="between" crescents="crescents" favorable="favorable" first="first" font="font" highly="highly" its="its" lunar="lunar" moon="moon" most="most" moving="moving" near="near" occur="occur" of="of" one="one" orbital="orbital" perigee="perigee" rapidly="rapidly" require="require" size="-1" sunset="sunset" the="the" visible="visible" whereas="whereas" would="would" years="years">1
/2 days after the actual lunar conjunction, 50% occur more than 1+3/4 days after conjunction, and 30% more than 2 days after conjunction. When the lunar altitude is exceptionally unfavorable and Moon is moving most slowly near its orbital apogee, which occurs in about 7.5% of years, the visible crescent of Tishrei is first seen more than 2+1/2 days after conjunction — but the crescent is essentially never first seen beyond 3 days after conjunction (unless weather conditions interfered with its visibility). The earliest new lunar crescent sightings from the records of the present era Israeli New Moon Society at <http://sites.google.com/site/moonsoc/> are always more than 24 hours after the actual lunar conjunction (at sea level, without optical aids). Relative to the molad of Tishrei, which can be as much as 16 hours later than the actual conjunction in the present era, the earliest visible new lunar crescent should be at least 6 hours later than the molad moment. Therefore the 6-hour cutoff cited from the Talmud does fit the astronomy of the present era if the term molad is understood to refer to the molad arithmetic of the Traditional Hebrew Calendar. On the other hand, it would be very uncommon for the new crescent to be visible only 6 hours after the molad, and in the era of the Talmud the minimum elapsed time would have had to be at least 7+1/2 hours.
The Earth-to-Moon distance at the lunar orbital perigee is quite variable. Lesser perigee distances are associated with faster lunar orbital motion and shorter elapsed times from conjunction to visible crescent. Likewise the Earth-to-Moon distance at the lunar orbital apogee is also quite variable. Greater apogee distances are associated with slower lunar orbital motion and longer elapsed times from conjunction to visible crescent.
It might seem that the lunar latitude is not very important in regard to the molad of Tishrei, because Rosh HaShanah is near the southward equinox, when Sun and Moon set close to due west. If the lunar latitude is at its extreme 5° south of the ecliptic, Moon will appear to set to the left of the sunset point, or if Moon is at its extreme 5° north of the ecliptic it will appear to set to the right of the sunset point. The greater the lunar latitude is at sunset, however, either south or north of the ecliptic, the longer the arc-of-light from Sun to Moon will be, enhancing the probability that the new lunar crescent will be visible.
In the far distant future, around Hebrew year 12000 if the Hebrew calendar solar drift is left uncorrected, when the Earth orbital aphelion is close to Rosh HaShanah (it is currently in Tammuz), the lunations will tend to be shorter at that time of year. In that millennium the maximum limit will be reduced to 2+1/2 days (97.5th percentile) or absolute maximum of 2+3/4 days, but the minimum limit will increase closer to a full 24 hours (at sea level, without optical aids). Only 5% of years in that millennium will have less than 24 hours elapsed from actual conjunction to visible crescent in Jerusalem.
Back in the millennium beginning with Hebrew year 4000, when the Earth orbital aphelion was in Sivan, the lunations near Rosh HaShanah tended to be slightly longer than they are at present, so an actual lunar conjunction after midnight was essentially never associated with a visible crescent at the next sunset in Jerusalem. This leads to another possible explanation. The classical Hebrew word used to specify the cutoff time is chatzot. The context of the cutoff time discussion is that if witnesses come to testify that they saw the new lunar crescent, but the moment of the (actual) lunar conjunction is calculated to have occurred after chatzot, then their testimony can be confidently refuted because it is still too early for the new crescent to be visible. The word chatzot, unqualified, has two possible meanings: either midnight or noon, so it can refer either to the middle of the day or the middle of the night. To unambiguously qualify the intended meaning, the qualifier haLeilah (of the night) or haYom (of the day) could have been used. Thus chatzot haLeilah would have unambiguously referred to midnight, and chatzot haYom would have unambiguously referred to noon. The Talmud, in its typically terse style, only used the unqualified chatzot. All commentators and translators that I have seen have understood the word chatzot as referring to noon, but astronomically it could only be sensible to understand it as referring to midnight, unless the intention was to err on the side of very liberally accepting doubtful testimonies.

2. Lo ADU Rosh: If the molad of Tishrei falls on Sunday, Wednesday or Friday then postpone Rosh HaShanah to the next day.

This is the most commonly invoked postponement rule, but logically should be checked after the first rule given above, because the first rule can postpone the Rosh HaShanah weekday from an allowable weekday to a disallowed weekday, in which case this second rule would cause a further one day postponement to the next allowable weekday.
For example, Hebrew years 5746, 5749, 5753, 5780 have Sunday to Monday postponements; years 5741, 5748, 5768 have Wednesday to Thursday postponements; and years 5757, 5764, 5784 have Friday to Saturday postponements.
This postponement rule is for ritual convenience: The Talmud Bavli tractate Rosh HaShanah page 20a states that excluding Wednesday and Friday is to prevent Yom Kippur from occurring on either side of Shabbat, which would be ritually inconvenient with regard to the burial of a corpse, and the Talmud Bavli tractate Sukkah 43a as well as Talmud Yerushalmi tractate Sukkah 4:5 says that excluding Sunday is to prevent Hoshannah Rabbah from occurring on Shabbat, which would render the willow branches muktze (not to be touched on Shabbat) so they couldn't be beaten to symbolize the final elimination of sins. Note that Succot always starts on the same weekday as Rosh HaShanah.
Remy Landau <http://hebrewcalendar.tripod.com/#10> points out that this rule reduces the number of Qeviyyot (Hebrew year types) from 28 to 16, and it also prevents the first day of Rosh HaShanah from falling adjacent to Shabbat (although Rosh HaShanah can and does fall on Shabbat itself).
Implementation tip: If the molad date is converted to a weekday as an integer from Sunday=0 through Saturday=6 then the molad is on a disallowed weekday if ( MoladWeekday × 3 ) MOD 7 < 3.

3. If the molad of Tishrei for a non-leap year (12 months) falls on Tuesday on or after 9 hours and 204 parts then postpone Rosh Hashanah to Thursday.

There is no need to check this rule if the molad moment was already found to fall on or past noon or on a disallowed weekday.
As explained by Remy Landau, see <http://hebrewcalendar.tripod.com/#12>, this rule eliminates all of the 356-day years that would otherwise be caused by the disallowed weekday rule.
If the molad of Tishrei falls on Tuesday on or after 9h 204p and the year is not a leap year, then the next molad of Tishrei will be 12 × the molad interval later, which will place it on or after noon on Shabbat (Saturday), which will be postponed to Sunday, but that day is not allowed, so it will be postponed again to Monday. This double-day postponement would cause this year length to be 356 days, but the longest possible length of a non-leap year is 355 days (where Cheshvan and Kislev both are full 30-day months). Therefore Rosh HaShanah this year is postponed from Tuesday to Wednesday, and because Wednesday is not allowed it is postponed again to Thursday, making this year an acceptable 354 days.
Rather than explicitly checking the molad time against the fixed cutoff of 9h 204p, which is incompatible with any variable interval molad such as the progressive molad or the actual lunar conjunction, a generic alternative is simply to postpone Rosh HaShanah if the next molad of Tishrei will be on or after noon on Shabbat. The Gauss shortcut (adding 1/4 day) can also be used on that molad moment, triggering the 2-day postponement for this year if the next molad of Tishrei plus 1/4 day will land on Sunday. Alternatively, postpone this Rosh HaShanah by two days if the following expression is true:
floor( NextTishreiMolad + 1/4 day ) – floor( ThisTishreiMolad + 1/4 day ) = 355
This rule is invoked in only about 3.31% of years (for example, Hebrew years 5620, 5640, 5647, 5667, 5718, 5745, 5789, 5796, 5816, 5867, 5887, 5894), and such years are always non-leap years having 354 days. Although the intervals between these uncommon postponements average to about once per 30 years, only 8 intervals are actually possible within the Traditional Hebrew Calendar:
Interval (years): 7 20 27 31 44 51 64 71
% Occurrence: 18.7% 35.2% 10.1% 2.6% 1.9% 24.1% 1.1% 6.3%

4. If the molad of Tishrei after a leap year (13 months) falls on Monday on or after 15 hours and 589 parts then postpone Rosh Hashanah to Tuesday.

There is no need to check this rule if the molad moment was already found to fall on or past noon or on a disallowed weekday.
As explained by Remy Landau, see <http://hebrewcalendar.tripod.com/#13>, this rule eliminates all of the 382-day years that would otherwise be caused by the disallowed weekday postponement rule.
If the molad of Tishrei is Monday on or after 15h 589p and the prior year was a leap year, then the previous molad of Tishrei would have been 13 × the molad interval earlier, which would have placed it on or after noon on Tuesday, which would have been postponed to Wednesday, but that day is not allowed, so it would have been again postponed to Thursday. This would have caused that prior year length to be only 382 days, but the shortest possible length of a leap year is 383 days (where Cheshvan and Kislev both are deficient 29-day months). Therefore Rosh HaShanah this year is postponed from Monday to Tuesday, making the prior year an acceptable 383 days.
Rather than explicitly checking the molad time against the fixed cutoff of 15h 589p, which is incompatible with any variable interval molad such as the progressive molad or the actual lunar conjunction, a generic alternative is simply to postpone Rosh HaShanah if the prior molad of Tishrei was on or after noon on Tuesday. Again, the Gauss shortcut (adding 1/4 day) can be used on that molad moment, triggering a postponement for this year if the prior molad of Tishrei plus 1/4 day landed on Wednesday. Alternatively, postpone this Rosh HaShanah by one day if the following expression is true:
floor( ThisTishreiMolad + 1/4 day ) – floor( PriorTishreiMolad + 1/4 day ) = 383
This rule is invoked in only about 0.54% of years (for example, Hebrew years 5096, 5194, 5441, 5519, 5688, 5766, 6013, 6111), and again such years are always non-leap years having 354 days. Although the intervals between these rare postponements average to about once per 186 years, only 5 intervals are actually possible within the Traditional Hebrew Calendar:
Interval (years):7898169247345
% Occurrence:22.1%15.5%12.3%41.2%8.9%

Frequencies of Rosh HaShanah Postponements and Weekdays

The overall frequencies of applicability of the Rosh HaShanah postponement rules are shown below, and are similar to those given by Remy Landau at <http://hebrewcalendar.tripod.com/#24.3>. Note that it is least common for Rosh HaShanah to start on Tuesday, and most common for it to start on Thursday.
When Rosh HaShanah does start on Thursday there are two days of Yom Tov (High Holy Days) followed by Shabbat for Rosh HaShanah, plus, outside Israel, the same for the first two and last two days of Sukkot.
Traditional Rosh HaShanah Postponements and Weekdays
(number of years per 1000 years, disallowed weekdays are Sunday, Wednesday, Friday)
Year Range No Shift Delayed 1 Delayed 2 Monday Tuesday Thursday Saturday
4001-5000 394 469 137 277 116 318 289
5001-6000 388 469 143 282 114 319 285
6001-7000 390 468 142 280 117 316 287
7001-8000 390 470 140 280 114 323 283
8001-9000 387 471 142 280 115 318 287
9001-10000 390 469 141 278 116 318 288

The Visibility of the New Lunar Crescent on Rosh HaShanah

Rambam, in Hilchot Kiddush HaChodesh (literally translates as "The Laws of Sanctification of the New Month") wrote that the reason for the postponements has to do with the underlying nature of the mean astronomical calculations that are employed for the molad, in point 7 of chapter 7, vaguely suggesting that the postponements bring the date of Rosh HaShanah closer to the actual lunar conjunction. In the next statement, however, he contradicted himself by hinting that the postponements increase the likelihood that the lunar crescent will be visible at sunset at the beginning of Rosh HaShanah (point 8 of chapter 7). These attributes are mutually exclusive. The actual lunar conjunctions precede the visible new lunar crescent by 1 to 3 days. If the postponements were to bring Rosh HaShanah closer to the actual lunar conjunction then they would have to decrease the probability of observing the new crescent on the holiday. On the other hand, if they were to increase the likelihood of observing the new lunar crescent on Rosh HaShanah then that could only be accomplished by delays relative to the actual lunar conjunctions. Astronomical analysis of the visible crescent frequencies on Rosh HaShanah will reveal which of these alternatives is correct, as follows:
I used the computer algorithms for the lunar cycle, solar longitude, and visible crescent criteria from "Calendrical Calculations" by Nachum Dershowitz and Edward M. Reingold, third edition published in 2008 by Cambridge University Press, hereinafter referred to by the mnemonic CC3, plus some algorithms from "Astronomical Algorithms" by Jean Meeus, second edition, published in 1998 by Willmann-Bell, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Lunar crescent visibility varies with weather conditions, clouds, atmospheric dust and clarity (especially in the westerly direction), temperature, humidity, nearby and westerly light pollution, and local elevation with unobstructed view of the horizon. Astronomically it depends on the apparent lunar size and brightness, elongation from Sun, and altitude above the horizon at sunset. Human factors include observer maturity, truthfulness, sanity, visual acuity and stereoscopic perception, iris pigmentation and pupil diameter, experience and preparation, and the use of optical aids such as telescopes or binoculars.
It also helps a lot to know exactly when and where to look, and then to actually look at the correct position in the sky! When the new lunar crescent is very dim, it may be visible only to more light-sensitive peripheral vision, rather than the sharpest central color vision. In such cases, it might be seen only when one looks slightly askance of its position, then away, then back again.
The probability of false sighting for a typical observer has been estimated at 15%, hence observational calendars that depend on a few positive sightings from a large number of observers will almost invariably start early by mistake. False sightings can, however, be refuted if the Moon was actually below the horizon or ahead of the actual lunar conjunction at the moment when it is claimed the new lunar crescent was seen. If the moment of the actual lunar conjunction is known to good accuracy (better than ±1 minute is easy to calculate), then testimony claiming a sighting less than 18 hours later is highly doubtful.
For the prediction of the visibility of the new lunar crescent I use the following mathematical criteria as recommended by Dershowitz & Reingold in CC3, as implemented in their visible-crescent function:
  • for the locale of Jerusalem, Israel, compute the moment when the mid-point of Sun is 4.5° below the western horizon, so that the western sky is dark enough for possible observation of the new lunar crescent;
  • at that moment, if Moon hasn't passed its solar conjunction, then it will be impossible to see a new lunar crescent;
  • for that moment, compute the arc-of-light from the geocentric mid-point of Sun to the geocentric mid-point of Moon (the "elongation" of Moon from Sun as if viewed from the center of Earth) — if the arc-of-light is less than 10.6° then the crescent probably won't be visible;
  • for the same moment, compute the lunar altitude (above the western horizon) — if Moon will be less than or equal to 4.1° above the horizon, then the crescent probably won't be visible, even if the arc-of-light is sufficient.
Using the above criteria, the absolute minimum elapsed time between actual lunar conjunction and first visibility of the new lunar crescent at sunset in Jerusalem is about 3/4 day. Published crescent visibility reports, such the records of the Israeli New Moon Society available at <http://sites.google.com/site/moonsoc/sightings>, rarely document reliable sightings any earlier than 24 hours after conjunction, even with optical aids. Therefore the above criteria are probably optimistic and applicable to ideal observing conditions.
The above criteria ignore the apparent lunar diameter (Moon can appear up to 25% larger at closest perigee than at furthest apogee), and the CC3 algorithms ignore atmospheric refraction and lunar parallax when calculating the lunar altitude. When Moon is near the horizon, atmospheric refraction makes the apparent lunar position as seen from the surface of Earth (topocentric position) about 1/2 degree higher than its position as calculated for the center of Earth (geocentric position), and lunar parallax makes Moon appear about 1 degree lower, so the net effect of atmospheric refraction and lunar parallax will make Moon appear about 1/2 degree lower than I calculate. This partially accounts for "optimistic" crescent predictions.
Using the above methods and criteria I computed when the lunar crescent ought to be visible from Jerusalem at sunset at the beginning of the first and second days of Rosh HaShanah (click here or on the graphs below to view a high-quality PDF 91KB):
For the present era, the crescent ought to be visible from Jerusalem at sunset on the first day of Rosh HaShanah in only about 1/6 of years, but this proportion will more-or-less steadily increase in coming years, reaching 50% of years a few centuries after the year 10000. Of the visible crescents, most occur in years where Rosh HaShanah is delayed by two days, and the new lunar crescent will never be visible when Rosh HaShanah is not postponed — at least not until beyond the year 9000.
Naturally, the crescent is much more likely to be visible at sunset on the second day of Rosh HaShanah: in almost 2/3 of all years at present (increasing to almost 90% of years by year 10000), including almost all two-day postponement years, almost 2/3 of the one-day postponement years (increasing to almost all such years by year 10000), and more than 1/4 of the non-postponed years (increasing to almost 3/4 of such years by year 10000).
Even though the postponements of Rosh HaShanah do make it more likely that the new lunar crescent will be visible, it would be hard to defend any claim that that was an original consideration in the development of the postponement rules, because in the era of Hillel ben Yehudah the crescent ought to have been visible on the first day of Rosh HaShanah in only about 16% of years (although they should have seen the crescent in more than 60% of years on the second day of the holiday). Furthermore, they would not have known that the crescent would more often be visible in distant future years.
In comparing actual lunar conjunctions to the moments of the traditional molad, where the molad is expressed in the traditional manner as the number of hours since sunset, which I call "Talmudic Temporal Time", it is necessary to subtract 6 hours from the molad moment so that it is in terms of the civil time used for the actual lunar conjunctions.
The reason for the distant future increases in crescent visibility is that the molad interval is now 2/3 second longer than the actual mean duration of lunations (mean synodic month). The mean synodic month is continuing to get shorter at a steady rate of about 1/3 mean solar second per thousand years, due to tidal slowing of the Earth rotation rate, which was not recognized until the beginning of the 20th century and then was accurately measured only after the advent of Atomic Time (1955) and Laser Lunar Ranging (1969). This progressive shortening of the mean synodic month is causing an accelerating lateward drift of the molad, such that future moladot will occur at progressively later moments with respect to the actual mean lunar conjunctions. In the era of Hillel ben Yehudah (Hebrew year 4119 = Julian 358 AD), the molad of Tishrei was about 4+1/5 hours later than the actual mean lunar conjunctions. In the present era that molad is about 6 hours late. By year 8000 it will be 11+3/4 hours late, and by year 10000 it will be about 21+1/3 hours late. The probability of the crescent being visible on Rosh HaShanah (or on any Rosh Chodesh, especially for months that follow a postponed Rosh HaShanah) progressively increases as the molad gets later and later with respect to the actual lunar conjunctions. Please see my analysis of the molad drift, what is causing it, how it varies between months and over the years, and what can be done to adjust the molad arithmetic, presented on my Hebrew Calendar Studies web page at <http://www.sym454.org/hebrew/>.

The Net Effect of the Rosh HaShanah Postponements

During the development of the Rectified Hebrew Calendar, I experimented with allowing any month to have 29 or 30 days, whichever yielded the best alignment relative to the molad. I then compared the date agreement against the Traditional Hebrew Calendar, and found that the best agreement was obtained by adding 24 hours to the molad moments used for the Rectified Hebrew Calendar, and this offset was optimal for both the traditional molad and the progressive molad. This observation suggests that the net effect of the Rosh HaShanah postponements, on average, is the equivalent of delaying month starts by 24 hours relative to the molad moment. This is an interesting observation, because in the present era, as mentioned above, the earliest time that the new lunar crescent can be seen is 24 hours after the actual lunar conjunction. I therefore conclude that the net effect of the Rosh HaShanah postponements is to prevent the old lunar crescent from still being visible when a month starts, and to enhance the likelihood that the new lunar crescent will be visible when months start (but not before it starts).
Obviously there are exceptions to this average net effect, because the nominally alternating 29- or 30- day fixed month lengths of the Hebrew Calendar can get "out of phase" with respect to the actual lunar conjunctions, especially when there are 3 deficient or full months in a row (when Cheshvan and Kislev are either both deficient 29-day or both full 30-day months), and there is the superimposed ±14 hours of periodic variability of the actual lunar conjunctions relative to the secular mean lunar conjunction moments. (The word secular, derived from the Latin saeculum, in this context refers to a variation that spans centuries, that is the progressively shorter mean synodic month).
When people first study the traditional Hebrew calendar, they are always surprised to learn that the traditional molad moments that are announced during the Sabbath morning synagogue services prior to the start of each new month (except Tishrei) actually have nothing to do with the Hebrew calendar itself, for it is only the molad of Tishrei that has any relevance to the calendar. Most people mistakenly belief that months start on the day of the molad, or on the day after the molad, but that would have required allowing any month to have 29 or 30 days. The establishment of fixed lengths for most Hebrew calendar months was a major side-effect of adopting the Rosh HaShanah postponement rules, because allowing 2-day postponements of Rosh HaShanah created a constraint precluding variable month lengths, for otherwise such a postponement could have extended the month of Elul to 30 or 31 days with truncation of the following Tishrei to 29 or only 28 days!

http://individual.utoronto.ca/kalendis/hebrew/postpone.htm

BIBLICAL NEW MOON CALENDAER
http://www.everlastingkingdom.info/article/115/

Summary
The molad zakein rule prevents any molad moment from landing after the first day of any calendar month, the disallowed weekday postponement rule serves ritual convenience, and the 3rd and 4th rules prevent impossible year lengths that would otherwise be caused by the effect of the molad zakein rule on Rosh HaShanah of the prior or coming year, respectively. The net effect of the Rosh HaShanah postponement rules is to cause months to start on average one day after the molad moment. The establishment of fixed lengths for most Hebrew calendar months was a major side-effect of adopting the Rosh HaShanah postponement rules.
Updated 5 Shevat 5772 (Traditional) = 5 Shevat 5772 (Rectified) = Jan 28, 2012 (Symmetry454) = Jan 28, 2012 (Symmetry010) = Jan 29, 2012 (Gregorian)